November 27, 2014, 12:54:20 PM

Author Topic: Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L MKII worth the Extra Money?  (Read 4953 times)

candyman

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1457
    • View Profile
    • My photographs
Re: Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L MKII worth the Extra Money?
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2013, 05:05:57 AM »
I purchased the Tamron. I actually tested and compared the Tamron with Canon MK II. Though it wasn't a thorough fieldtest. I found the Canon to be sharper in the corner at 24mm. AF may have been a little faster on the Canon compared to the Tamron when shooting moving subjects (cars passing by). There is a difference between those 2 lenses but since I am not a pro-photographer earning money with photography, I decided that I could not justify  paying 1000 euro more (that is about 1300 dollars). So for me personally it wasn't worth it.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2013, 06:48:00 AM by candyman »

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L MKII worth the Extra Money?
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2013, 05:05:57 AM »

Eldar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1704
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L MKII worth the Extra Money?
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2013, 01:20:53 PM »
As far as lens test sites I trust photozone.de numbers more than TDP's charts (and TDP seems to almost always have a bad copy of tamron somehow).

Just a comment; If you read Bryan´s review (TDP) of the Canon 24-70 f2.8L II, you´ll see that he had significant issues with the first lenses he tested, so it is not just Tamron.
5DIII, 1DX, 8-15/4L, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 70-300/4-5.6L IS, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, Zeiss 15/2.8, 17/4L TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8, 24/3.5L TS-E II, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss Otus 55/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85/1.4, 100/2.8L IS Macro, Zeiss 135/2, 600/4L IS II

terminatahx

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
    • Aubrey Williams photography
Re: Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L MKII worth the Extra Money?
« Reply #17 on: September 10, 2013, 02:21:14 PM »
Uh, If Image quality and focusing performance is important to you, YES!  Tamron is a value lens, nothing more.
1Dx | EF24-70 f2.8LII | EF100 f2.8LIS | EF16-35 f2.8LII | TSE-17 f4L | EF8-15 f4L Fish | EF 50 f1.4 | EF85 f1.8 | EF14 f2.8LII

TWI by Dustin Abbott

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1653
    • View Profile
    • dustinabbott.net
Re: Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L MKII worth the Extra Money?
« Reply #18 on: September 10, 2013, 04:54:18 PM »
Uh, If Image quality and focusing performance is important to you, YES!  Tamron is a value lens, nothing more.

That's not even close to the truth. 

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/tamron-sp-24-70mm-f-2-8-vc-usd-lens-review-19056

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/canon-ef-24-70mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm-lens-review-20563

http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/canon-24-70-f2-8-ii-resolution-tests

I have yet to read a review that claimed that the optical or focusing performance of the new Canon was anything more than a minimal upgrade over the Tamron.  The new Tamron sits right between the old Canon 24-70 and the new one in terms of wide open image quality.  Stopped down there is no perceptible difference between the new Canon and the Tamron.
6D x 2 | EOS-M w/22mm f/2 + 18-55 STM + EF Adapter| Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC | 35mm f/2 IS | 40mm f/2.8 | 100L | 135L | 70-300L -----OLD SCHOOL----- SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5, Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5, SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8, Helios 44-2 and 44-4, Super Takumar 150mm f/4

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Is the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L MKII worth the Extra Money?
« Reply #18 on: September 10, 2013, 04:54:18 PM »