July 31, 2014, 07:24:04 PM

Author Topic: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!  (Read 4341 times)

nubu

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« on: September 20, 2013, 08:38:00 AM »
Canon DPP Version 3.13.45

- Supports images taken with EOS 70D, EOS Kiss X7 / EOS Rebel SL1 / EOS 100D, PowerShot G16, PowerShot S120.
- Supports new lens (EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM, EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X, EF-M 11-22mm f4-5.6 IS STM).
- The accuracy of the white balance in M-RAW and S-RAW images has been improved.
5DII/III,7D,400D,m|EF14/2.8LII,EF24/1.4LII,EF35/1.4L,EF40/2.8,EF50/1.4,MPE65/2.8,EF85/1.2L,EF100/2.8LIS,EF135/2L,EF200/2.8L,EF300/2.8LIS,EF500/4LIS,Zeiss500/8,EF1.4xIII,EF2xIII,EF8-15/4L,EFS17-55/2.8IS,EFS18-55/3.5-IS,EF24-105/4,allEFM

canon rumors FORUM

Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« on: September 20, 2013, 08:38:00 AM »

Marsu42

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4360
  • ML-66d / 100L / 70-300L / 17-40L / 600rts
    • View Profile
    • 6D positive spec list
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2013, 08:45:16 AM »
- The accuracy of the white balance in M-RAW and S-RAW images has been improved.

Yay! In your face, all people who think Canon won't be doing anything meaningful for the rest of 2013 :-p

mrsfotografie

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1246
  • M.R.S. = my initials! www.mrsfotografie.nl
    • View Profile
    • MRS fotografie
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2013, 09:44:44 AM »
Thanks for the head's-up. I just updated DPP to this latest version from 3.12.52. I'm a little bit curious about the white balance improvements as I do shoot in SRAW-1 (5DII) and MRAW (7D).

And while I was at it I updated EOS utility too, from 2.12.3.1 to 2.13.25 (not that I think it makes any real difference).
5D3, 5D2, NEX-6 | SY14mm f/2.8, Ʃ20mm f/1.8, 24mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, Ʃ35mm f/1.4A, 50mm f/1.8 I, Ʃ50mm f/1.4 EX, 100mm f/2.8L Macro, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 1.4x II, 70-300L, 100-400L | E-mount: SY12mm f/2, Ʃ19mm & 30mm f/2.8 EX DN, 16-50 & 55-210 OSS | 2x FT-QL, AE-1P, FD(n) & FL primes

Marsu42

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4360
  • ML-66d / 100L / 70-300L / 17-40L / 600rts
    • View Profile
    • 6D positive spec list
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2013, 09:53:29 AM »
I'm a little bit curious about the white balance improvements as I do shoot in SRAW-1 (5DII) and MRAW (7D).

Thanks for mentioning it, I never met anyone actually using these since 18/21mp file sizes arent like the Nikon d800 ... why do you do it, to save disk/card space (you could also just use dng lossy compression)?

mrsfotografie

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1246
  • M.R.S. = my initials! www.mrsfotografie.nl
    • View Profile
    • MRS fotografie
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2013, 10:04:40 AM »
I'm a little bit curious about the white balance improvements as I do shoot in SRAW-1 (5DII) and MRAW (7D).

Thanks for mentioning it, I never met anyone actually using these since 18/21mp file sizes arent like the Nikon d800 ... why do you do it, to save disk/card space (you could also just use dng lossy compression)?

Thanks for asking, Marsu42. Well, it's based on the experience that with the 10 megapixels of the 40D I previously owned, I never really ran out of resolution. I have prints on canvas at 80x120 cm from that camera that are fine and I won't print any larger than that.

Also, I rarely crop my photo's because they really have to be 'just right' out of camera so usually I have the full 10 megapixels to work with. Any cropping will be limited to the very edges if there's something really disturbing there, or I'll fix that in post. Only on occasion I do shoot in full RAW if I really want to maximize resolution or if I expect to be cropping heavily. This can be if I unexpectedly don't have enough reach for instance. And I've shot some amazing high-res panorama's.

DNG is not an option for me as I like to keep the files in native raw format, and I use DPP to process my Canon photo's. For the Sony NEX files I do use Lightroom.

Hence to save on card and drive space, I generally shoot in these smaller RAW formats that are approx 10 megapixels :)
« Last Edit: September 20, 2013, 10:07:05 AM by mrsfotografie »
5D3, 5D2, NEX-6 | SY14mm f/2.8, Ʃ20mm f/1.8, 24mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, Ʃ35mm f/1.4A, 50mm f/1.8 I, Ʃ50mm f/1.4 EX, 100mm f/2.8L Macro, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 1.4x II, 70-300L, 100-400L | E-mount: SY12mm f/2, Ʃ19mm & 30mm f/2.8 EX DN, 16-50 & 55-210 OSS | 2x FT-QL, AE-1P, FD(n) & FL primes

mackguyver

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2461
  • Who Dares Wins
    • View Profile
    • My Personal Work
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2013, 01:14:11 PM »
I'm a little bit curious about the white balance improvements as I do shoot in SRAW-1 (5DII) and MRAW (7D).

Thanks for mentioning it, I never met anyone actually using these since 18/21mp file sizes arent like the Nikon d800 ... why do you do it, to save disk/card space (you could also just use dng lossy compression)?

Thanks for asking, Marsu42. Well, it's based on the experience that with the 10 megapixels of the 40D I previously owned, I never really ran out of resolution. I have prints on canvas at 80x120 cm from that camera that are fine and I won't print any larger than that.

Also, I rarely crop my photo's because they really have to be 'just right' out of camera so usually I have the full 10 megapixels to work with. Any cropping will be limited to the very edges if there's something really disturbing there, or I'll fix that in post. Only on occasion I do shoot in full RAW if I really want to maximize resolution or if I expect to be cropping heavily. This can be if I unexpectedly don't have enough reach for instance. And I've shot some amazing high-res panorama's.

DNG is not an option for me as I like to keep the files in native raw format, and I use DPP to process my Canon photo's. For the Sony NEX files I do use Lightroom.

Hence to save on card and drive space, I generally shoot in these smaller RAW formats that are approx 10 megapixels :)
Your logic makes sense to me, but I shoot full-res because I never know when I'll need more pixels.  I had a client who (disappointingly) used my photos at 2"x3" last year come back wanting 40"x60" prints for their lobby.  The 21MP 5DII files were just enough resolution to scale at 3.25x or higher depending on the original cropping.  One photo of a Live Oak with tens of thousands of leaves had to be scaled over 6x and was right at the limit of looking acceptable using Perfect Resize.  Of course that was my customer's favorite photo and the most heavily cropped :).  Had I shot at a lower resolution, I might have lost out on the business and disappointed my best customer.
EOS 1D X, 5DIII, M + EF 24 f/1.4II, 50 f/1.2, 85 f/1.2II, 300 f/2.8 IS II || 16-35 f/4 IS, 24-70 f/2.8II, 70-200 f/2.8II || TS-E 17 f/4, 24 f/3.5II || M 22 f/2, 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS || 1.4x III, 2x III

mrsfotografie

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1246
  • M.R.S. = my initials! www.mrsfotografie.nl
    • View Profile
    • MRS fotografie
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2013, 03:27:02 PM »
Your logic makes sense to me, but I shoot full-res because I never know when I'll need more pixels. I had a client who (disappointingly) used my photos at 2"x3" last year come back wanting 40"x60" prints for their lobby.  The 21MP 5DII files were just enough resolution to scale at 3.25x or higher depending on the original cropping.  One photo of a Live Oak with tens of thousands of leaves had to be scaled over 6x and was right at the limit of looking acceptable using Perfect Resize.  Of course that was my customer's favorite photo and the most heavily cropped :).  Had I shot at a lower resolution, I might have lost out on the business and disappointed my best customer.

I'm usually my own client, as I shoot purely for hobby purposes so if I disappoint anyone it will be myself. I can fully appreciate that if you're shooting professionally, there's no reason to skimp on megapixels and file sizes ;)
5D3, 5D2, NEX-6 | SY14mm f/2.8, Ʃ20mm f/1.8, 24mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, Ʃ35mm f/1.4A, 50mm f/1.8 I, Ʃ50mm f/1.4 EX, 100mm f/2.8L Macro, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 1.4x II, 70-300L, 100-400L | E-mount: SY12mm f/2, Ʃ19mm & 30mm f/2.8 EX DN, 16-50 & 55-210 OSS | 2x FT-QL, AE-1P, FD(n) & FL primes

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2013, 03:27:02 PM »

Click

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2624
    • View Profile
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2013, 03:30:30 PM »
Thank you for sharing this information nubu.

Marsu42

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4360
  • ML-66d / 100L / 70-300L / 17-40L / 600rts
    • View Profile
    • 6D positive spec list
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2013, 04:31:44 PM »
Well, it's based on the experience that with the 10 megapixels of the 40D I previously owned, I never really ran out of resolution.

You should petition Canon for releasing another 10mp camera body, but with 10 stops additional dynamic range and 5 stops more iso capability :-) ...

.... btw even though I also hardly ever need 18mp, afaik quality is better if shooting full res and postprocess (denoise, ...) before downsizing rather than let the camera do it - but of course larger images need more computer power. But it's fine if your workflow works for you, you never change aspect ratio, and I now learned that are a people who use m/s-raw constantly :-)

mrsfotografie

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1246
  • M.R.S. = my initials! www.mrsfotografie.nl
    • View Profile
    • MRS fotografie
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2013, 03:58:37 AM »
Well, it's based on the experience that with the 10 megapixels of the 40D I previously owned, I never really ran out of resolution.

You should petition Canon for releasing another 10mp camera body, but with 10 stops additional dynamic range and 5 stops more iso capability :-) ...

.... btw even though I also hardly ever need 18mp, afaik quality is better if shooting full res and postprocess (denoise, ...) before downsizing rather than let the camera do it - but of course larger images need more computer power. But it's fine if your workflow works for you, you never change aspect ratio, and I now learned that are a people who use m/s-raw constantly :-)

Well, there is at least one! :) I have no complaints of image quality in M/SRAW vs full RAW. However I wouldn't want Canon to go for 10 Megapixels camera's again because despite the increase in megapixels, sensors have gotten better at high iso's. And remember, I can alway sgo to full res when I deem it necessary :)

FWIW, in the white balance drop down menu, there now appears to be a choice between the specific in-camera setting, and post-processing settings:
« Last Edit: September 21, 2013, 04:06:25 AM by mrsfotografie »
5D3, 5D2, NEX-6 | SY14mm f/2.8, Ʃ20mm f/1.8, 24mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, Ʃ35mm f/1.4A, 50mm f/1.8 I, Ʃ50mm f/1.4 EX, 100mm f/2.8L Macro, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 1.4x II, 70-300L, 100-400L | E-mount: SY12mm f/2, Ʃ19mm & 30mm f/2.8 EX DN, 16-50 & 55-210 OSS | 2x FT-QL, AE-1P, FD(n) & FL primes

pedro

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 764
    • View Profile
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2013, 05:37:38 AM »
The server page at Canon Europe and USA wasn't accessible, when I attempted to download the update yesterday night 23.00 GMT. I'll stop by later on.
30D, EF-S 10-22/ 5DIII, 16-35 F/2.8 L USM II, 28 F/2.8, 50 F/1.4, 85 F/1.8, 70-200 F/2.8 classic,
join me at http://www.flickr.com/groups/insane_isos/

TTMartin

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2013, 08:32:46 AM »
Canon DPP Version 3.13.45

- Supports images taken with EOS 70D, EOS Kiss X7 / EOS Rebel SL1 / EOS 100D, PowerShot G16, PowerShot S120.
- Supports new lens (EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM, EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X, EF-M 11-22mm f4-5.6 IS STM).
- The accuracy of the white balance in M-RAW and S-RAW images has been improved.

Looks like Canon took it down. Checked both Canon USA and Canon Europe. Canon Europe site still shows it, but, the download link is dead.
Tom

TTMartin

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2013, 09:56:56 AM »
Canon DPP Version 3.13.45

- Supports images taken with EOS 70D, EOS Kiss X7 / EOS Rebel SL1 / EOS 100D, PowerShot G16, PowerShot S120.
- Supports new lens (EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM, EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X, EF-M 11-22mm f4-5.6 IS STM).
- The accuracy of the white balance in M-RAW and S-RAW images has been improved.

Looks like Canon took it down. Checked both Canon USA and Canon Europe. Canon Europe site still shows it, but, the download link is dead.
It's available again.
Wonder why Canon temporarily took it down?
Tom

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2013, 09:56:56 AM »

Don Haines

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2849
  • Posting cat pictures on the internet since 1986
    • View Profile
Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2013, 12:27:05 PM »
Canon DPP Version 3.13.45

- Supports images taken with EOS 70D, EOS Kiss X7 / EOS Rebel SL1 / EOS 100D, PowerShot G16, PowerShot S120.
- Supports new lens (EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM, EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4X, EF-M 11-22mm f4-5.6 IS STM).
- The accuracy of the white balance in M-RAW and S-RAW images has been improved.

Looks like Canon took it down. Checked both Canon USA and Canon Europe. Canon Europe site still shows it, but, the download link is dead.
It's available again.
Wonder why Canon temporarily took it down?

It's possible that the servers were too busy and refused connections...

I just downloaded it from Canon USA with no problems... about 4 seconds for the dppw update (66Mbytes and 5 seconds for the EUW update (88Mbytes).....
The best camera is the one in your hands

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon DPP Version 3.13.45 update!
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2013, 12:27:05 PM »