February 25, 2018, 09:10:24 AM

Author Topic: 24-105 Resolution testing  (Read 7954 times)

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 22216
Re: 24-105 Resolution testing
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2013, 06:49:02 AM »
I can't see why you can't somewhat reproduce it (only if you want to compare your copy).

What good is 'somewhat reproducing' the test conditions if those conditions aren't likely to produce reproducible results?
EOS 1D X, EOS M6, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 24-105 Resolution testing
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2013, 06:49:02 AM »

Pi

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 912
    • Math and Photography
Re: 24-105 Resolution testing
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2013, 06:08:45 PM »
Looks good for that ISO but try ISO 100, tripod, no IS. Better yet - natural light, speed faster than 1/100.

It's a shot of an LCD screen (at an angle as well). So, how would natural light be better?

Natural light would be stronger. He can use ISO 100 and 1/100 s or faster.

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 22216
Re: 24-105 Resolution testing
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2013, 06:29:29 PM »
Looks good for that ISO but try ISO 100, tripod, no IS. Better yet - natural light, speed faster than 1/100.
It's a shot of an LCD screen (at an angle as well). So, how would natural light be better?

Natural light would be better if direct, natural light shining on a backlit LCD makes it brighter and increases contrast.  In my experience, neither is true.
EOS 1D X, EOS M6, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 24-105 Resolution testing
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2013, 06:29:29 PM »