December 07, 2016, 06:18:48 AM

Author Topic: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?  (Read 30466 times)

Pi

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 933
    • Math and Photography
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2013, 05:07:40 PM »
Art – These lenses are developed with an emphasis on artistic touch and are designed to meet the expectations of users who value a creative, dramatic outcome. Along with landscapes, portraits, still-life, close-up and casual snaps, these lenses are perfect for the kind of photography that unleashes the inner artist. Ideal for studio photography, they offer just as much of an expressive scope when capturing architecture, starry skies, underwater shots and many other scenes. .

Wow, whoever wrote that is good!  ;)

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2013, 05:07:40 PM »

dburren

  • Canonflex
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #31 on: October 13, 2013, 05:52:48 PM »
Unfortunately I see no evidence that this lens is real. Sure it would be nice to see, and I'm hopeful that Sigma is preparing to introduce more lenses like this, but this image proves nothing.
It is not a photograph. It is a software render of a 3D model. But that doesn't disprove the lens' existence: Sigma use renders like this as product images all the time.
But someone else could easily have created the model and rendered the image (using the same software?) to look like Sigma's images.

It would be an interesting lens option. Hopefully sharper than the EF 24-105/4 (and my experience with the Sigma GV lenses says that after calibration it probably would be). But at the same time bigger filters and increased weight (and possibly higher cost) would be negatives.
Like all these rumoured Sigma lenses, we'll have to wait and see. But fingers crossed!

RGF

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2280
  • How you relate to the issue, is the issue.
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #32 on: October 13, 2013, 05:57:22 PM »
Unfortunately I see no evidence that this lens is real. Sure it would be nice to see, and I'm hopeful that Sigma is preparing to introduce more lenses like this, but this image proves nothing.
It is not a photograph. It is a software render of a 3D model. But that doesn't disprove the lens' existence: Sigma use renders like this as product images all the time.
But someone else could easily have created the model and rendered the image (using the same software?) to look like Sigma's images.

It would be an interesting lens option. Hopefully sharper than the EF 24-105/4 (and my experience with the Sigma GV lenses says that after calibration it probably would be). But at the same time bigger filters and increased weight (and possibly higher cost) would be negatives.
Like all these rumoured Sigma lenses, we'll have to wait and see. But fingers crossed!

weight seems too heavy for this lens

dryanparker

  • Rebel T6i
  • ****
  • Posts: 121
  • Art photographer based in Miami.
    • Portfolio
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #33 on: October 13, 2013, 06:19:03 PM »
Not sure why someone would go through the process of faking images of a 24-105. It's just not a very polarizing offering. If this was an Art 14-24, seems that would be different!
5D3, 24-70L II, TS-E 24L II, Zeiss ZE 15 T* // X100S
www.dryanparker.com

ajfotofilmagem

  • 1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #34 on: October 13, 2013, 06:36:01 PM »
If Sigma had some inside information that Canon 24-105L will be discontinued or replaced by a more expensive model, this gap can be filled successfully by hypothetical Sigma 24-105.

Menace

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1370
  • New Zealand
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #35 on: October 13, 2013, 07:05:38 PM »
If the Sigma offering has better IQ and is cheaper than Canon - it's likely to be very successful. However, I believe healthy competition is good for consumers as Canon will reply with something even better.  Interesting development.
1Dx | 5D III
85 1.2L II | 100 2.8 | 400 2.8L IS II 
24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

brad-man

  • 5DSR
  • *******
  • Posts: 1003
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #36 on: October 13, 2013, 07:07:03 PM »
I think it's safe to say that the Sigma (hypothetically) will be sharper, have less distortion and much improved image stabilization. I would like to think that Sigma knows that folks like weather sealing in the Canon version and would hopefully include it in theirs. I don't think the added weight will hurt too much since most folks are probably using it as a single lens solution and so intend to leave their tele at home. AF speed and accuracy will be the determining factor as to whether this is a really good lens or a great one.

I have no interest in this lens anyway. I'm still waiting for an 85 and a 135.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2013, 07:08:50 PM by brad-man »

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #36 on: October 13, 2013, 07:07:03 PM »

RGomezPhotos

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 328
    • Ricardo Gomez Photography
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #37 on: October 13, 2013, 07:16:26 PM »
The Sigma has the same focal length range & max aperture, and it extends just like Canon's. So what would make one choose it over Canon kit?

If the lens is real, the filter size could be a clue to Sigma trying to beat Canon in kit lens IQ, e.g. less vignetting & barrel distortion at the wide end & wide open.

That the filter size is larger and the lens being heavier is a big clue that Sigma are aiming to beat the Canon lens for IQ in many areas and this should not be too hard.

The only question this brings to mind is if it becomes to heavy, does it become less "ok" to walk around with it?

If it also becomes available in Nikon and Sony mounts then it will become a "must have" lens for the D800 crowd as it would likely trump the current Nikon 24-120/f4 in terms of IQ and a worthwhile addition to the gallery of available lenses for Sony owners.

Agreed. 

In theory, the Canon 24-105L is a really good walk-around lens.  But I've never been impressed with it's IQ.  IMO, it's really a $800 retail-priced lens.  Not $1150.  It's only marginally better than the Canon 18-200 EF-S lens...  If the 18-200 was an EF, I'd probably get it instead of the 24-105.  It's that good.

If the Sigma is a good 20% better than Canon's and possibly $200 less expensive, I'd be down for that.   ;)
« Last Edit: October 13, 2013, 11:45:08 PM by RGomezPhotos »
EOS 5D MKII & 50D, Zeiss 50mm f1.4
www.ricardogomezphotography.com

gunnar997

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Film is cheaper than opportunity
    • 500px
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #38 on: October 13, 2013, 07:46:35 PM »
this looks really similar to the Canon 17-55 2.8. Focus ring size zoom ring looks a tad smaller. But still looks pretty real just cause its a similar design doesn't mean its fake. There are only so many designs out there.

I want them to update the rest of their prime line-up though! they have the 35 1.4, now where is a new 24 50 and 85 1.4? thats what I want long as they hold form with the 35!
Also prime tele's! 300 400 and 500! expensive still just for their size but, they'd have to be cheaper than Canon's line-up.
7D+grip, 70-200 f/2.8L IS I, 17-55 f/2.8, 50 f/1.4, and some studio lights

Zv

  • 1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1678
    • Zeeography (flickr)
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #39 on: October 13, 2013, 08:03:38 PM »
I remember when images of the 18-35 f/1.8 first surfaced. We all thought those were fakes, and look what happened.

I reckon the lens exists, maybe it looks like this or maybe it doesn't. Either way you know Sigma are gonna do something soon!

I can't see it being cheaper than the current Canon version. If it does, I'd be tempted. Well who wouldn't?
Move along nothing to see here!

AussieSimon

  • Canonflex
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #40 on: October 13, 2013, 08:03:52 PM »
<p>I will leave you guys to debate how legit the photograph is below. To my eyes, it looks pretty good.</p>

TLDR: That is not a photograph!

If it's not blindingly obvious to you that this is a 3D rendering, your eyes need checking. And it's not even a particularly good 3D rendering either, with absolutely no surface texture to speak of. I'm not saying it isn't an official press picture created by Sigma, but it's pretty embarrassing for a photography website to mistake an artificial drawing for a photograph.

luciolepri

  • Rebel T6i
  • ****
  • Posts: 134
    • Lucio Lepri - Director and script writer
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #41 on: October 13, 2013, 08:13:10 PM »
I'm not interested in this lens, so I don't care much about this rumor. My only hope is that putting a little focusing ring at the bottom of the lens and a big zoom ring at the top, like in the Tamron 24-70/2.8 and in these pictures of the Sigma 24-105, won't become the new trend...
I can't find any good reason for that, while I can find plenty of downsides. I really don't get it.

flanker

  • SX60 HS
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #42 on: October 14, 2013, 05:18:01 AM »
Photo/3D rendering looks professional.
But 82mm and +200g? It must be priced like 17-70. In other way forget.
For other brands than Canon can be more attractive.
"A" sign is strange. But Sigma should think different to users. That's is no problem.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #42 on: October 14, 2013, 05:18:01 AM »

endiendo

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 47
    • personal web
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #43 on: October 14, 2013, 05:21:44 AM »
hi,
It's true that the Canon 24-105 F4 L is not really impressive. One of the "cheapest" L..  but the range is very useful when we want to walk "light".
That's said, the Sigma is much bigger and heavier, and, I think, every Canon 24-105 owner has a better lens when he wants to really take a very good shot on a specific "goal" subject.  I'm not sure if I would change if I was in that case.
And, my  wife and I have had already 2 sigma, one small for the first reflex of my wife..  I remember it was something like 24-135..  I'm not sure..   the first example we receive was just out of focus. The second, even well focused, was not sharp at all. 
Then, more recently, we bought the 100-300 f2.8 is os hsm (first stabilized version), and after 4 months, we had it back to service.. the stabilizer was broken and making noise. they changed it and it is now ok.
But, 2 sigma lenses = 2 lenses back to sigma.
And, 4 canon lenses, 4 lenses without any problems.
I'm not sure I would buy a new sigma lens...
photo amateur since 2004.
Canon 5d mark iii, canon 24-105 f4 L, canon 100 mm f2.8 macro L, canon 17-40 f4 L, sigma 120-300 f2.8 dg os hsm, canon ef 50 f1.8 II

AdamJ

  • Guest
Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #44 on: October 14, 2013, 06:08:21 AM »
<p>I will leave you guys to debate how legit the photograph is below. To my eyes, it looks pretty good.</p>

TLDR: That is not a photograph!

If it's not blindingly obvious to you that this is a 3D rendering, your eyes need checking. And it's not even a particularly good 3D rendering either, with absolutely no surface texture to speak of. I'm not saying it isn't an official press picture created by Sigma, but it's pretty embarrassing for a photography website to mistake an artificial drawing for a photograph.

My Sigma 35mm also has "no surface texture to speak of." This image is in pretty much the same style as the official images released by Sigma for all other Global Vision lenses so, as you rightly say, this may well be an official Sigma image, which is the central point here.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Sigma 24-105 f/4 DG OS Outed?
« Reply #44 on: October 14, 2013, 06:08:21 AM »