November 24, 2014, 12:55:34 PM

Author Topic: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?  (Read 6963 times)

bchernicoff

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
    • View Profile
    • My Photos
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2013, 09:54:53 AM »
Thousand Thanks, Sir, Dear Mr. bchernicoff.
From your Test at F= 1.4 both lens, My decision is to keep My Dear Sigma 50 mm F/ 1.4 and Not spend my money $ 1619 US Dollars for That Beautiful Canon 50 mm F/ 1.2 L.
No, Sir, Not worth 4 time of the cost of my old Sigma, just one stop faster and better Contrast/ Better Colors that my Old yes could not see the difference.
Thanks again, Sir for your great Job.
Surapon

You're welcome! Also 1.2 is only a half stop faster than 1.4.
6D, Fuji X-T1, X-E1
Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 400mm f/2.8L II, 100mm L IS Macro, Sigma 85mm, & 35mm f/1.4's, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8,
Fuji 23mm 1.4, 35mm 1.4, 56mm 1.2, 14mm 2.8, 18-55, 55-200

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2013, 09:54:53 AM »

mackguyver

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3017
  • Who Dares Wins
    • View Profile
    • My Personal Work
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2013, 10:09:27 AM »
Thousand Thanks, Sir, Dear Mr. bchernicoff.
From your Test at F= 1.4 both lens, My decision is to keep My Dear Sigma 50 mm F/ 1.4 and Not spend my money $ 1619 US Dollars for That Beautiful Canon 50 mm F/ 1.2 L.
No, Sir, Not worth 4 time of the cost of my old Sigma, just one stop faster and better Contrast/ Better Colors that my Old yes could not see the difference.
Thanks again, Sir for your great Job.
Surapon
You're welcome! Also 1.2 is only a half stop faster than 1.4.
I think the 50 1.2 is a great lens, but I don't think it's as good as Canon's other L primes, and ultimately not worth the money unless you need the things I mentioned previously.  If you shoot at 50mm a lot and need great performance from f/1.2-2, I would buy it, but if it will see limited use, you're better off putting that money into another lens and getting the 1.4.  Another thing to throw out is the that the 24-70 f/2.8 II is as sharp as both primes from f/2.8 on and is only a bit worse on CA and vignetting.

surapon

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2374
  • 80% BY HEART, 15% BY LENSES AND ONLY 5% BY CAMERA
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #32 on: October 31, 2013, 10:41:08 AM »
Thousand Thanks, Sir, Dear Mr. bchernicoff.
From your Test at F= 1.4 both lens, My decision is to keep My Dear Sigma 50 mm F/ 1.4 and Not spend my money $ 1619 US Dollars for That Beautiful Canon 50 mm F/ 1.2 L.
No, Sir, Not worth 4 time of the cost of my old Sigma, just one stop faster and better Contrast/ Better Colors that my Old yes could not see the difference.
Thanks again, Sir for your great Job.
Surapon



You're welcome! Also 1.2 is only a half stop faster than 1.4.

Thanks you again, Sir, Dear Mr. bchernicoff
Surapon

surapon

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2374
  • 80% BY HEART, 15% BY LENSES AND ONLY 5% BY CAMERA
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #33 on: October 31, 2013, 10:49:01 AM »
Thousand Thanks, Sir, Dear Mr. bchernicoff.
From your Test at F= 1.4 both lens, My decision is to keep My Dear Sigma 50 mm F/ 1.4 and Not spend my money $ 1619 US Dollars for That Beautiful Canon 50 mm F/ 1.2 L.
No, Sir, Not worth 4 time of the cost of my old Sigma, just one stop faster and better Contrast/ Better Colors that my Old yes could not see the difference.
Thanks again, Sir for your great Job.
Surapon
You're welcome! Also 1.2 is only a half stop faster than 1.4.
I think the 50 1.2 is a great lens, but I don't think it's as good as Canon's other L primes, and ultimately not worth the money unless you need the things I mentioned previously.  If you shoot at 50mm a lot and need great performance from f/1.2-2, I would buy it, but if it will see limited use, you're better off putting that money into another lens and getting the 1.4.  Another thing to throw out is the that the 24-70 f/2.8 II is as sharp as both primes from f/2.8 on and is only a bit worse on CA and vignetting.

Thousand Thanks, Sir, Dear Mr. mackguyver.
Now, at this time ( past 2 months), I just fell in love with my  Canon TS-E 24 mm. F/ 3.5 L MK II , For Local Scenery shots. I not use  my 50 mm Sigma past 5 months, Just 1 time ti test the Shallow DOF at F/ 1.4 only.
Yes, Sir, Thanks for your Great Comments--Yes, My Next Lens = Canon 24 -70 MM F/ 2.8 L II, And I will  Give my Trustfully Old 24-70 L 2.8 to my son.
Thanks again , Sir.
Surapon

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4538
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #34 on: October 31, 2013, 09:32:20 PM »
Hi I'm stuck deciding if I should upgrade my 50mm 1.8 to a 1.2 or go with the 1.4, I've done some research and read that the Sigma 50mm 1.4 is a better lens than the Canon 1.4. If you have had any of these lens any advice would be great to help me make my decision.

i would do nothing and wait to see what the new 50mm comes out with and keep using your 1.8 in the mean time
APS-H Fanboy

Menace

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1372
  • New Zealand
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2013, 02:04:31 AM »
Thousand Thanks, Sir, Dear Mr. bchernicoff.
From your Test at F= 1.4 both lens, My decision is to keep My Dear Sigma 50 mm F/ 1.4 and Not spend my money $ 1619 US Dollars for That Beautiful Canon 50 mm F/ 1.2 L.
No, Sir, Not worth 4 time of the cost of my old Sigma, just one stop faster and better Contrast/ Better Colors that my Old yes could not see the difference.
Thanks again, Sir for your great Job.
Surapon
You're welcome! Also 1.2 is only a half stop faster than 1.4.
I think the 50 1.2 is a great lens, but I don't think it's as good as Canon's other L primes, and ultimately not worth the money unless you need the things I mentioned previously.  If you shoot at 50mm a lot and need great performance from f/1.2-2, I would buy it, but if it will see limited use, you're better off putting that money into another lens and getting the 1.4.  Another thing to throw out is the that the 24-70 f/2.8 II is as sharp as both primes from f/2.8 on and is only a bit worse on CA and vignetting.

Thousand Thanks, Sir, Dear Mr. mackguyver.
Now, at this time ( past 2 months), I just fell in love with my  Canon TS-E 24 mm. F/ 3.5 L MK II , For Local Scenery shots. I not use  my 50 mm Sigma past 5 months, Just 1 time ti test the Shallow DOF at F/ 1.4 only.
Yes, Sir, Thanks for your Great Comments--Yes, My Next Lens = Canon 24 -70 MM F/ 2.8 L II, And I will  Give my Trustfully Old 24-70 L 2.8 to my son.
Thanks again , Sir.
Surapon

You'll love the 24-70 II and your son will be extremely happy with the original version. Happy family :)
1Dx | 5D III
85 1.2L II | 100 2.8 | 400 2.8L IS II 
24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

Menace

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1372
  • New Zealand
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2013, 02:07:49 AM »
Hi I'm stuck deciding if I should upgrade my 50mm 1.8 to a 1.2 or go with the 1.4, I've done some research and read that the Sigma 50mm 1.4 is a better lens than the Canon 1.4. If you have had any of these lens any advice would be great to help me make my decision.

As others have said, if you'll be shooting from 1.2 to 2.0, get the 50 1.2 otherwise get the 1.4 and save a lot of money.

Personally, i love my 50 1.2  :D
1Dx | 5D III
85 1.2L II | 100 2.8 | 400 2.8L IS II 
24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2013, 02:07:49 AM »

Twostones

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2013, 04:18:31 AM »
As others have said, wait for the new 50 that should be out soon.  If you can't wait get the 50mm 1.4.  I have the 1.4 and it is really a very good lens, so good in fact I see no need to upgrade to the expensive 1.2.  The 50 1.4 is also really inexpensive. You can use the $1000 you didn't spend on something else.

RoaVision

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #38 on: November 06, 2013, 09:05:14 AM »
Thanks everybody for the comments and advice. I'm considering going with the 1.4 and just waiting to see if any new 50mm come out. Now just debating if I should go with Sigma or Canon I'm hearing positive and negative things about both. Or just go with a 85mm f1.8 and continue to keep my 50mm f1.8

Rat

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #39 on: November 06, 2013, 09:55:50 AM »
The 85/1.8 has terrible CA in high contrast shots. I hardly use it at all, because I like high contrast... :(
Fed up with brandism.

RoaVision

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #40 on: November 06, 2013, 10:11:41 AM »
The 85/1.8 has terrible CA in high contrast shots. I hardly use it at all, because I like high contrast... :(

so you would recommend going with the 50mm 1.4 ?

Rat

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #41 on: November 06, 2013, 10:20:02 AM »
Can't comment on that, sorry, I never worked with that. I'm just warning you that if you like contrast, the 85/1.8 is not for you :)
Fed up with brandism.

RoaVision

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #42 on: November 07, 2013, 09:27:17 AM »
Thank you everyone. I decided to get the 50mm 1.4

now just time to enjoy it and ill post some shots once I use it. thank you once again

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #42 on: November 07, 2013, 09:27:17 AM »

Rat

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
    • View Profile
Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #43 on: November 07, 2013, 09:40:32 AM »
Sigma or Canon? :)
Fed up with brandism.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Help. 50mm 1.2 ?
« Reply #43 on: November 07, 2013, 09:40:32 AM »