(Apologies if this has been asked/answered before, but if so I can't find it.) I couldn't stand using the EOS-M but was impressed by its image quality as far as APS-C sensors go, somewhat better than the Rebel I briefly used for a while as a back-up. Can anyone who has used both in RAW mode say whether the SL1 offers similarly improved image quality? (There are lots of reviews of each around the web, of course, but the only comparisons I've seen are of out-of-camera JPEGs and thus useless.) Thanks in advance.