Additionally, he adds in that the 1Dx and 5D3 would have never AF'd in a particular situation that the 6D did. He also makes the accusation that we've never shot with the 6D so how can we comment?
1. The 1Dx and 5D3 would have easily AF'd in that case, so that point right there is simply objectively WRONG.
2. He hasn't shot with the 1Dx or 5D3, yet makes the above comment. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
Is he for real? There's NO WAY any sane person could both make the arguments he's making and simultaneously believe in those arguments.
The AF system of the 1Dx is best = $6799
The AF system of the 5D3 is second best = $3399
The AF system of the 6D is the "least good" out of all 3 = $2000 ish
It's just silliness. The 6D is a nice, affordable 135 format DSLR. It has some nice features, but AF is hardly its selling point. -3LV autofocus, as has been pointed out, has some significant practicality issues.
Who the hell ever said the 6D's autofocus was a "selling point"? Not me. I'm calling b/s though, and that's now your color.
Wow. Relax, Carl. It's a turn of phrase. I intended it as synonymous with "strong point."
I don't even know what you mean by the bit about color... ?