October 24, 2017, 03:27:41 AM

Author Topic: Why Wedding Photographers’ Prices are “Wack”?  (Read 16395 times)

alexanderferdinand

  • EOS 7D Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Why Wedding Photographers’ Prices are “Wack”?
« Reply #45 on: December 25, 2013, 03:18:39 AM »
@ orangutan: food is necessary, but not a wedding fotographer.
If some pay 3k or 11k (hello dear Mr. Suprapon!), so there will be some who take that.

If you not willing to pay so much, so what?

I never took more than €1000, but this was years ago.

Another observation: as strange it may sound: if you take less, youre work is less appriciated.

Merry X- mas from Austria!
1D MKIV, 1DX MkII, 5D Mk IV; lot of lenses, flashes etc
Fuji X100s, Sony RX100 III,
Fuji X- XT1, X- Pro2, XF 23 1,4, XF 18- 55 2,8-4, X- T1, XF 16/1,4, XF 55- 200, XF 56/1,2, XF 50-140, XF 100- 400

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Why Wedding Photographers’ Prices are “Wack”?
« Reply #45 on: December 25, 2013, 03:18:39 AM »

dgatwood

  • EOS 5DS R
  • ******
  • Posts: 922
  • 300D, 400D, 6D
Re: Why Wedding Photographers’ Prices are “Wack”?
« Reply #46 on: December 25, 2013, 09:03:30 PM »
Another observation: as strange it may sound: if you take less, youre work is less appriciated.

This.  Psychologically speaking, there's a natural assumption that quality costs, and although some folks may appreciate finding the exception to that rule, most people will assume that the higher-priced shop will do the best work.  Therefore, it probably makes sense to advertise at a slightly more expensive price than average for your area, but not so much more expensive that people don't bother to contact you.  Then give a discount.  That way, they go into it thinking not that they got an inexpensive photographer, but rather that they got a great deal on a great one.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Why Wedding Photographers’ Prices are “Wack”?
« Reply #46 on: December 25, 2013, 09:03:30 PM »