September 18, 2014, 06:22:26 PM

Author Topic: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses  (Read 2428 times)

Mr_Canuck

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« on: December 17, 2013, 11:30:30 PM »
Just signed on to this forum. You all seem pretty decent and not creepy. I'll keep an eye out though.  ;) But I digress.

I expect nothing less than a whole bunch of conflicting opinions on lens selection for me, so thanks in advance... and sorry for being long winded...

Quick background:
I've owned a Sony a700 (crop) then an a850 (full frame) with a bag full of great Minolta primes and a couple zooms over the years. It all got too big and cumbersome. I switched to Pentax for a while. But I simply came to miss "that look" of my full frame images. There also isn't a local camera shop that sells either Sony or Pentax, which is a hassle.

I'm switching to Canon and currently shopping. I like what they have to offer, and my local store carries it.

I'm a serious hobbyist, shoot a bit of everything. Travel, hike, portraits, lots of landscapes and still life, macro (but it's close-ups under available light rather than ring flash illuminated fly eyeballs). I rarely use a flash. Sometimes do a paid gig as part of my graphic design work, and the odd event. We live in the Rocky Mountains.

For me, portability is important. I'm also trying to reduce redundancy in focal lengths, and therefore reduce decisions about what to take along with me.

I have a Sony RX100 for everyday, middle of the road, video, skiing, impromptu snapshots or when I just can't take an SLR. It's been great for what it is.

I'm 100% getting a 6D body. I'm the perfect candidate. I rarely use continuous AF or burst mode. Rarely any sporting events. I'm coming from Pentax, so any AF is fast. Since film days, I habitually centre-spot-focus and pan to my subject. I like the 6D's lightness and relative simplicity. It's grip alone won me over the D600. I tend to be more slow and methodical in my photography. I've tried and really like the 6D. And I've found a 430EX for cheap for the 3-5 times a year I use a flash.

So, on to the all important lenses...

I'm thinking about getting the following:

70-200 f4 IS
-- it seems the best compromise of fast enough, small enough and could handle a 1.4xTC if I got the itch. I thought really hard about the 70-300L but I just think I'll pick up and take the 70-200 more often. I think I've found a great used one for $800 to check out this week. The 2.8's are out of the question simply for their size.

17-40 f4 -- I liked my Minolta 20/2.8 (FF) and my Pentax 15 (crop), but I don't hear great things about the Canon 20. Zeiss prime options are out of my budget. Portability and flexibility are priorities. I'm typically taking landscape or shots outdoors, or if indoors I have time or a tripod. Shooting at f/5.6-11 isn't a problem. The 17-40 seems to fit the bill. Like the 77mm filter. I understand there are some mixed views on the corner quality, so I will try and test a few copies.

Any objections?

With these two lenses, I feel like I'm covering a nice landscape-focussed setup, and the 70-200 could be a nice portrait lens too. And it's all fairly weather sealed for my mostly outdoor shooting.

I don't plan to get a mid-range or walk-around zoom. I had a 28-75/2.8 on my Sony and found I always preferred my fast primes. I have the RX100 for walk around, and honestly it's really good. I am happy enough in the 35-85mm range to just work with primes and move around to adjust framing if I need to.

But now I'm head scratching on which primes. I'd like one or two max. (Done with LBA, and you can hold me to it!)

Ideally, I'd like something (fairly) fast for portraits and something (fairly) macro, but I don't really need 1:1. Is there one that covers both? I am usually satisfied with f2-4 for portraits and low-light and rarely pine for f1.4-8 in any shots. That said, except for the wide angle (like 17-40) I want to be confident in the quality I get out of my lenses wide open.

Considerations...

50 f2.5 Macro -- I'm going to try one for the first time this Friday. My small town store has none. I had a Minolta 50 2.8 macro that I really enjoyed. I like to do hand-held close-ups more than ultra-close macros. The f2.5 can also double as a fairly decent portrait lens. I understand it's pretty ancient and the AF is not USM, but hey, I'm coming from Minolta and Pentax lenses all of which were screw-driven. I found the Canon 50 1.8 to be quiet in comparison.

Tamron 90 VC -- I like that it's a little shorter, smaller and lighter than the 100s/105s, and seems excellent except maybe bokeh not as dreamy as 100L. I can get one for under $600 new. 6-year warranty. Hmm.

Canon 100's -- Not sure where to go with this. The 100L seems great but it'll be well over $1000 in Canada so that breaks the bank (whereas the Tamron is cheaper here, go figure). The non-IS Canon 100 is a consideration but the Tamron seems to appeal more.

Another consideration is to get the zooms now and just wait till 2014 and whatever the new 50mm ends up being. If they came out with a 50mm USM IS f/2 with .5x macro I'd be in heaven. But that won't happen. I hear a new 85 is a possibility too.

(I'm also used to in-camera shake reduction so don't know if I'll miss having IS on a lens. Though I have pretty steady hands.)

40 STM -- This almost takes me back to Pentax. I'm going to pass though as it's redundant with the 17-40, and I'd rather have either macro (even .5) or something faster. It doesn't offer me enough. I'll just pop the RX100 in my pocket.

50 1.8 or 1.4 -- If this was my choice I think I'm happy enough to wait till 2014 and see what might be. Although for 100 bucks the 1.8 might be something to try for now. I think I feel the same about the 85/1.8 and 100/f2. When I start to talk about these ones I start looking over at the Tammy 90. I had a Minolta 100/f2 and it was simply spiffy (and no purple finger or CA to boot). But I think the benefits of the macro and VC/IS outweigh the extra stop.

There. That's it. 8000 words. I'm interested in your reflections on the matter...if you didn't hang up and leave before you got to the end.  ???

« Last Edit: December 17, 2013, 11:35:36 PM by Mr_Canuck »
6D | Voigt 20 | 40STM | 50/2.5M | 70-200/4is | EX420 | ST-E2 | Velbon ultra lux iL | RX100 — go light, go far...

canon rumors FORUM

New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« on: December 17, 2013, 11:30:30 PM »

Mt Spokane Photography

  • Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 8658
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2013, 11:53:15 PM »
I'd go for the 24-70mm f/4 IS rather than the 17-40 L.  Do you really use wider than 24mm that much?  I have a old 17mm f/3.5 Tamron Prime that I picked up used for $150, and its great. 
I'd pass on the 50mm semi Macro, the 24-70mm f/4 has close focusing and will likely take the place of the 50mm Macro.
One of the 85mm lenses is good for portraits.

KitsVancouver

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 87
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2013, 12:31:09 AM »
How important is budget?  Do you pixel peep?

Mr_Canuck

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2013, 01:27:15 AM »
I'd go for the 24-70mm f/4 IS rather than the 17-40 L.  Do you really use wider than 24mm that much?  I have a old 17mm f/3.5 Tamron Prime that I picked up used for $150, and its great. 
I'd pass on the 50mm semi Macro, the 24-70mm f/4 has close focusing and will likely take the place of the 50mm Macro.
One of the 85mm lenses is good for portraits.

That's an interesting suggestion. I hadn't looked seriously at the 24-70/f4 because (a) it's price seemed ridiculous, and (b) I hadn't fully understood it's macro capabilities. It's got exactly the kind of close focus ability I'm looking for, and I never light my macro subjects anyway. Thanks for the idea. However, the price remains exceedingly high. If it was closer to the 24-105 kit price, I'd be thinking harder about it.

Would definitely need to look into a cheaper ultra-wide prime though. 24 isn't wide enough for me!
6D | Voigt 20 | 40STM | 50/2.5M | 70-200/4is | EX420 | ST-E2 | Velbon ultra lux iL | RX100 — go light, go far...

Mr_Canuck

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2013, 01:29:01 AM »
How important is budget?  Do you pixel peep?

Budget is around $2000 for all lenses together. Sort of pixel peep but I'm more about the feeling. Definitely not a techie. Never shot a resolution chart or brick wall and never will.
6D | Voigt 20 | 40STM | 50/2.5M | 70-200/4is | EX420 | ST-E2 | Velbon ultra lux iL | RX100 — go light, go far...

Marsu42

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4529
  • ML-66d / 100L / 70-300L / 17-40L / 600rts
    • View Profile
    • 6D positive spec list
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2013, 05:26:09 AM »
I'd go for the 24-70mm f/4 IS rather than the 17-40 L.  Do you really use wider than 24mm that much?

Absolutely correct, 24mm is already very wide - though I find the rather little difference to 17mm to be important, it allows you to take more creative shots based on focal length while the "standard" range 24-70 could be also called "boring".

f2.5 Macro
Forget it, completely outdated, far too little working range on full frame

Quote from: Mr_Canuck link=topic=18638.msg348499#msg348499 date=138734103050
[b
Canon 100's[/b] -- Not sure where to go with this. The 100L seems great but it'll be well over $1000 in Canada so that breaks the bank (whereas the Tamron is cheaper here, go figure). The non-IS Canon 100 is a consideration but the Tamron seems to appeal more.

Still, the 100L would be my advice because it's a stellar dual-use macro/portrait lens, look out for Canon rebate programs. You can also get the very good 100 non-L, but the IS is useful when not shooting near 1:1 and the L has a focus limiter switch which makes the slow af much more useful for portraiture. Last not least, the 100L is the most "fun" lens as you can shoot everything w/o worrying about min. focusing distance.

ajfotofilmagem

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 905
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2013, 10:10:17 AM »
Welcome to Canon Rumors. The lenses you mentioned, will speak from my experience and tests I've read.
Canon 70-200 f4 IS - A great lens for a great value.
Canon 17-40 f4 - Image quality not very impressive, but is very good using aperture F8 or more closed. Samyang 14mm does a good job, if the manual focus is not a problem for you.
Canon 50 F2.5 Macro - Not really macro, and 40mm STM can be used instead of this.
Tamron 90 VC - Seems like a good value for money, but for macro the 100mm or 105mm actually allow a distance more convenient of object.
Canon 100mm - Both models Macro L, and Macro non-L are great. There is also the great 100mm F2 that is not macro but it's a great portrait lens I also use a lot.
Canon 50 1.8 or 1.4 - I have and prefer the F1.4 model, which is not perfect , but it has great picture when used at F1.8 or more closed, and should always use and carry with the lens hood to protect the mechanism of AF. If the rumors are right, a new Canon 50mm Image Stabilizer should be launched in 2014, with similar quality and price to the great canon 35mm F2 IS.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2013, 09:12:27 PM by ajfotofilmagem »

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2013, 10:10:17 AM »

mrzero

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2013, 10:18:56 AM »
I'd go for the 24-70mm f/4 IS rather than the 17-40 L.  Do you really use wider than 24mm that much?  I have a old 17mm f/3.5 Tamron Prime that I picked up used for $150, and its great. 
I'd pass on the 50mm semi Macro, the 24-70mm f/4 has close focusing and will likely take the place of the 50mm Macro.
One of the 85mm lenses is good for portraits.

That's an interesting suggestion. I hadn't looked seriously at the 24-70/f4 because (a) it's price seemed ridiculous, and (b) I hadn't fully understood it's macro capabilities. It's got exactly the kind of close focus ability I'm looking for, and I never light my macro subjects anyway. Thanks for the idea. However, the price remains exceedingly high. If it was closer to the 24-105 kit price, I'd be thinking harder about it.

Would definitely need to look into a cheaper ultra-wide prime though. 24 isn't wide enough for me!

The 24-70 f4 IS will start being available at a more reasonable price on the resale market in the near future.  It is being sold as part of 5DIII kits right now, and ebay has them around $1k resale right now.  That's about what you'd end up paying for the 17-40 and the 50 macro anyway.

For your ultrawide, consider the 20mm 2.8 (if you want AF), or the Rokinon 14mm 2.8.  I personally love the 20mm, although I haven't given it much use on full frame yet.  The Rokinon 14mm gets rave reviews, although some folks have said they needed to exchange a few times until they got a good copy on full frame corners.  It will be my next lens purchase, just waiting to make my jump to full frame permanent.
Canon 6d, t1i, 20/2.8, 28/1.8, 40/2.8, 50/1.8II, 100/2.8 macro, 70-300/4-5.6, g1x, 430exII, 90ex
Elan 7N with 28-105/3.5-4.5II, Rebel G with 35-70/3.5-4.5, A-1 with 28/2.8, 50/1.8, and 135/3.5

Marsu42

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4529
  • ML-66d / 100L / 70-300L / 17-40L / 600rts
    • View Profile
    • 6D positive spec list
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2013, 10:22:49 AM »
That's an interesting suggestion. I hadn't looked seriously at the 24-70/f4 because (a) it's price seemed ridiculous, and (b) I hadn't fully understood it's macro capabilities. It's got exactly the kind of close focus ability I'm looking for, and I never light my macro subjects anyway.

This is only part of the problem, even if you don't use flashes your own camera/lens shadow might get in the way if you have too little working distance... no to mention the fact that most animals will scare if you come too close if these are your motives.

RLPhoto

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3451
  • Gear doesn't matter, Just a Matter of Convenience.
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2013, 11:32:52 AM »
I used the 17-40L + 50mm + 70-200L F/4 IS combo for travel and it worked great. If you want to keep it light, I'd get those three.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2013, 11:57:10 AM by RLPhoto »

colvinatch

  • SX50 HS
  • **
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
    • Colvin Atchison Photography
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2013, 11:48:08 AM »
The 70-200 f4.0 L IS is a great lens, I use mine more that almost any other lens in my kit, save my 50 1.4, it (70-200) is light enough to carry and still has a nice reach, I sold my 70-200 2.8L IS as I was not using it nearly enough, I feel the 70-200 4.0 is sharper if you pixel peep.  As for my 17-40 f4.0 wide angle, I have been very pleased with the IQ from, no really soft corners on my copy and the center is plenty sharp.  I use the Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro, it is an excellent macro lens that can also be used as a fine portrait lens, I would consider the L version for the IS and may change out in the future but only for the IS and not the IQ, the non L has outstanding IQ.
7D, 5D Mk II, 17-40 L, 50 1.4, 24-70 2.8 L II, 100 2.8, 85 1.8, 70-200 4.0 L

AlanF

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1076
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2013, 01:46:48 PM »


There. That's it. 8000 words. I'm interested in your reflections on the matter...if you didn't hang up and leave before you got to the end.  ???

1,127 words ±100.
5D III, 70D, Powershot SX50, 300/2.8 II, 1.4xTC III, 2xTC III, 70-200/4 IS, 24-105, 15-85, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 150-600.

Mr_Canuck

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2013, 02:49:58 PM »
Quote

The 24-70 f4 IS will start being available at a more reasonable price on the resale market in the near future.  It is being sold as part of 5DIII kits right now, and ebay has them around $1k resale right now.  That's about what you'd end up paying for the 17-40 and the 50 macro anyway.

For your ultrawide, consider the 20mm 2.8 (if you want AF), or the Rokinon 14mm 2.8.  I personally love the 20mm, although I haven't given it much use on full frame yet.  The Rokinon 14mm gets rave reviews, although some folks have said they needed to exchange a few times until they got a good copy on full frame corners.  It will be my next lens purchase, just waiting to make my jump to full frame permanent.

I've been reading a little more about the 20 2.8. The venerable K Rockwell seems to think that Canon intentionally adjusted its design to maximize corner focus/clarity for field curvature when shooting in three dimensions (as opposed to test charts). He even gives it an acronym but I haven't read it anywhere else. He's constantly contradicting himself but I don't find he makes stuff up for no good reason. If the Canon 20mm was good in the field for landscapes, cityscapes etc, I'd be seriously interested in it. I just don't hear much from people who actually use it so I appreciate your input. I really liked my Minolta 20mm. Then I might be more amicable to a mid-range zoom like the 24-70. 14mm scares me but 20 I can frame up in my mind.
6D | Voigt 20 | 40STM | 50/2.5M | 70-200/4is | EX420 | ST-E2 | Velbon ultra lux iL | RX100 — go light, go far...

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2013, 02:49:58 PM »

Random Orbits

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1345
    • View Profile
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2013, 03:37:40 PM »
I've been reading a little more about the 20 2.8. The venerable K Rockwell seems to think that Canon intentionally adjusted its design to maximize corner focus/clarity for field curvature when shooting in three dimensions (as opposed to test charts). He even gives it an acronym but I haven't read it anywhere else. He's constantly contradicting himself but I don't find he makes stuff up for no good reason. If the Canon 20mm was good in the field for landscapes, cityscapes etc, I'd be seriously interested in it. I just don't hear much from people who actually use it so I appreciate your input. I really liked my Minolta 20mm. Then I might be more amicable to a mid-range zoom like the 24-70. 14mm scares me but 20 I can frame up in my mind.

I've never used the 20 f/2.8, but reading the review at TDP scared me away from it.  TDP recommends the 17-40 over the 20 f/2.8.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-20mm-f-2.8-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

I don't know how representative the review is because the lens is not that common.  Most people opt for 17-40 or 16-35 instead.  Now, if they gave it the same treatment as the 24 and 28mm f/2.8, then I'd be interested.

danski0224

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
    • View Profile
    • Some of my Work in Progress
Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2013, 06:35:25 PM »
I don't think you can beat the Canon 100L macro. It's a great macro lens and many have said it is also a great portrait lens, so 2 birds with 1 stone, and there have been some deals at Amazon recently (at least for USA shoppers).

You mention landscape work, and one typically assumes wide angle. A 24-70 could fit the bill, or the 24-105.

Not too many "cheap" options for wider, especially if you want AF. The Tokina 16-28 comes to mind.

The Canon Price Watch alerts work if you have time.
Some of my Work in Progress..... www.dftimages.com

canon rumors FORUM

Re: New to Canon - please help me decide on lenses
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2013, 06:35:25 PM »