July 22, 2014, 04:03:48 PM

Author Topic: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8  (Read 5410 times)

Canon Rumors

  • Administrator
  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2526
    • View Profile
    • Canon Rumors
Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« on: December 30, 2013, 09:47:38 AM »

Justin has completed our review of the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 lens. The small and much less expensive little brother of the magical (but not perfect) EF 85mm f/1.2L II. I personally love the 85 f/1.8, as it’s light, inexpensive, focuses fast and is optically very good.


Says Justin

“I’ve had a long and difficult time trying to place this lens. I’ve borrowed it, rented it, and used it on and off for almost 3 years. I want to love this lens; I want to tell myself it’s a viable alternative to the 85mm f/1.2L II when that  just simply isn’t true. It lacks the magical “feel” of the images that the 85 1.2L II produces. Of course, “Magic” comes at quite a cost. It’s more of a companion lens, something to accompany a tightly controlled prime kit.”


Read the full review | EF 85 f/1.8 at B&H Photo


cr


[image credit: The-Digital-Picture]


canonrumors.com

canon rumors FORUM

Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« on: December 30, 2013, 09:47:38 AM »

Dylan777

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3672
    • View Profile
    • http://dylannguyen.500px.com/home
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2013, 10:02:06 AM »
"I want to tell myself it’s a viable alternative to the 85mm f/1.2L II when that  just simply isn’t true. It lacks the magical “feel” of the images that the 85 1.2L II produces. Of course, “Magic” comes at quite a cost"

100% agree with statement above. Still, this is a good lens for those want to try Canon primes. Wish my 85L II has same AF speed as f1.8
« Last Edit: December 30, 2013, 10:08:11 AM by Dylan777 »
Body: 1DX -- 5D III
Zoom: 24-70L II -- 70-200L f2.8 IS II
Prime: 40mm -- 85L II -- 135L -- 400L f2.8 IS II

Dave_NYC

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2013, 10:25:43 AM »
Wish my 85L II has same AF speed as f1.8

I was a little surprised that AF speed difference was not mentioned. Being able to focus quickly in low light was a major point to chew on when I was looking at the 85mm 1.8, and it has a lot to do with why I am keeping it. Well, that, and the focal length plays well with what I do, it doubles as a portrait lens on FF, and the results are very useable wide open.

mackguyver

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2383
  • Who Dares Wins
    • View Profile
    • My Personal Work
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2013, 10:58:10 AM »
the results are very useable wide open.
Personally, I didn't find that to be the case when I tried it.  The sharpness at f/1.8 is okay for portraits, but I found the CA to be terrible until you stopped down.  I ended up going with the 50 f/1.4 at the time which I found to be a better fit for my crop sensor and was sharp and contrasty at f/2.  I've seen some great shots with the 85 f/1.8, but it just didn't impress me.  I'm glad I waited and saved up for the 1.2 II, it's in a whole other league despite it's many quirks.
EOS 1D X, 5DIII, M + EF 24 f/1.4II, 50 f/1.2, 85 f/1.2II, 300 f/2.8 IS II || 16-35 f/4 IS, 24-70 f/2.8II, 70-200 f/2.8II || TS-E 17 f/4, 24 f/3.5II || M 22 f/2, 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS || 1.4x III, 2x III

Quasimodo

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 864
  • Easily intrigued :)
    • View Profile
    • 500px.com
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2013, 11:02:44 AM »
Wish my 85L II has same AF speed as f1.8

I was a little surprised that AF speed difference was not mentioned. Being able to focus quickly in low light was a major point to chew on when I was looking at the 85mm 1.8, and it has a lot to do with why I am keeping it. Well, that, and the focal length plays well with what I do, it doubles as a portrait lens on FF, and the results are very useable wide open.

I agree totally, the AF speed is non-surpassed of the 85 for Canon I have tried. It is actually super fast. Mine, the Sigma 1.4 is not that quick, and I quite like it. However, after having borrowed the 1.2 for quite a while, I have to say that I regret using it, as it made my Siggy 1.4 less of a lens afterwards....

Interestingly, the comments about the chromatic abborations are true, but what he fails to mention is that (although not as prominent as the 1.8) the 1.2 also has its fair share of CA.
1Dx, 5DII w/grip, 3x600 EX RT, ST-E3
Canon: 8-15L, 16-35L II,  24-105L , 70-200L IS II, 17L TS, 135L, 100L, 2x III TC, 40 F2.8 STM, 50 F1.4. Sigma 35 F1.4 Art, Sigma 85 F1.4, Sigma 150-500.
www.500px.com/gerhard1972

noncho

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 159
    • View Profile
    • NonchoILiev.com
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2013, 11:31:16 AM »
The problem with this lens is purple fringing, CA too. This is the main reason why Canon needs to upgrade it (and 100/2), they are 20+ years old and should be updated for digital cameras.

Haydn1971

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 388
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2013, 12:01:13 PM »
Given the progress made in the last 10 years with digital and the smaller steps made with optic design, I'm starting to ponder if a step change in primes is due for the canon range.

We have the entry level non L primes with IS, 24mm, 28mm & 35mm currently, but I'd expect a 50mm, 85mm & one in the 16-18mm range soon.  Would it be a great stretch to add non-L versions of the 135mm & 200mm with STM & IS

We already have the start of a f1.4-2.8 range of primes, led by the 14mm & 24mm, the 35mm replacement has been expected for a while now, but what about an extended range with a f1.4 50mm L, an f1.8 85mm L IS, f2 135mm L IS

Then perhaps a stellar range of f0.95 L lenses at 35mm, 50mm & 85mm to replace the f1.2 lenses ?

Too much ?  ;-)  I've often thought that something like a 85-135mm f2 portrait zoom might go down well too ;-)
Regards, Haydn

:: View my photostream on Flickr, Canon EOS 6D, EOS M ,  16-35mm II, 24-70mm II, 70-300mm L, 135mm f2.0 L, 22mm f2.0, Lensbaby, EOS M adaptor, Cosina CT1G film SLR & 50mm f2.0 lens

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2013, 12:01:13 PM »

neech7

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 43
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2013, 01:44:49 PM »
Wish my 85L II has same AF speed as f1.8

I was a little surprised that AF speed difference was not mentioned. Being able to focus quickly in low light was a major point to chew on when I was looking at the 85mm 1.8, and it has a lot to do with why I am keeping it. Well, that, and the focal length plays well with what I do, it doubles as a portrait lens on FF, and the results are very useable wide open.

Of course they won't. It's human nature to not make oneself look dumb by saying that a lens they paid many times more is actually worse in some aspect. They grill the cheaper lens for its weaker points, which the 1.2 also suffers from to a lesser extent, but fail to mention the 1.8's lightning fast AF or non extending front element.

mrsfotografie

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1206
  • M.R.S. = my initials! www.mrsfotografie.nl
    • View Profile
    • MRS fotografie
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2013, 02:01:58 PM »
The problem with these 'portrait' primes (this, and the 100 f/2) is that no matter how much I want to love/find the need to get them, it doesn't seem reasonable to buy these lenses because the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II beats them image quality-wise straight from f/2.8. Portability/discretion is another thing though, when comparing these lenses to the zoom.

So I agree it is 'more of a companion lens, something to accompany a tightly controlled prime kit'.
5D3, 5D2, NEX-6 | SY14mm f/2.8, Ʃ20mm f/1.8, 24mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, Ʃ35mm f/1.4A, 50mm f/1.8 I, Ʃ50mm f/1.4 EX, 100mm f/2.8L Macro, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 1.4x II, 70-300L, 100-400L | E-mount: SY12mm f/2, Ʃ19mm & 30mm f/2.8 EX DN, 16-50 & 55-210 OSS | 2x FT-QL, AE-1P, FD(n) & FL primes

Dave_NYC

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2013, 02:02:36 PM »
The sharpness at f/1.8 is okay for portraits, but I found the CA to be terrible until you stopped down.  I ended up going with the 50 f/1.4 at the time which I found to be a better fit for my crop sensor and was sharp and contrasty at f/2.  I've seen some great shots with the 85 f/1.8, but it just didn't impress me.  I'm glad I waited and saved up for the 1.2 II, it's in a whole other league despite it's many quirks.

Heh. We're on opposite sides of the good lens copy table then. I got this to replace my 50mm 1.4 because of the extra reach, and because I don't like how the 50 looks down at F2 (where I need it to be - wish I could afford the 50 1.2 but not happening right now). I'm a lot happier with the 85mm results. I'm going to be selling my 50 soon because of this actually, and because I have other 2.8 lenses that can do a far better job than the 50 can wide open. I just need this 85mm for when I occasionally need that additional stop (and a bit) and a bit more reach than the 50mm can provide. I have other lenses for portraits, this is largely for low light use.

I've heard many good things about the 1.2, especially for portraits. But quick focusing in low light is non negotiable for me. Perhaps one day I'll get a 1.2 and experience the magic for myself for portraiture. Until then, I think this guy will serve me well, though I will be keeping an eye open for the (rumored) new 50mm 1.8 IS.

mackguyver

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2383
  • Who Dares Wins
    • View Profile
    • My Personal Work
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2013, 02:24:48 PM »
The sharpness at f/1.8 is okay for portraits, but I found the CA to be terrible until you stopped down.  I ended up going with the 50 f/1.4 at the time which I found to be a better fit for my crop sensor and was sharp and contrasty at f/2.  I've seen some great shots with the 85 f/1.8, but it just didn't impress me.  I'm glad I waited and saved up for the 1.2 II, it's in a whole other league despite it's many quirks.


Heh. We're on opposite sides of the good lens copy table then. I got this to replace my 50mm 1.4 because of the extra reach, and because I don't like how the 50 looks down at F2 (where I need it to be - wish I could afford the 50 1.2 but not happening right now). I'm a lot happier with the 85mm results. I'm going to be selling my 50 soon because of this actually, and because I have other 2.8 lenses that can do a far better job than the 50 can wide open. I just need this 85mm for when I occasionally need that additional stop (and a bit) and a bit more reach than the 50mm can provide. I have other lenses for portraits, this is largely for low light use.

I've heard many good things about the 1.2, especially for portraits. But quick focusing in low light is non negotiable for me. Perhaps one day I'll get a 1.2 and experience the magic for myself for portraiture. Until then, I think this guy will serve me well, though I will be keeping an eye open for the (rumored) new 50mm 1.8 IS.

I'm glad to hear it's working so well for you and it's funny how each lens (and lens+body combination) can yield such different results.  The 85 1.2 II focuses very accurately, but it is painfully slow, no matter the light.  Maybe I didn't give the 1.8 enough time, but the copy I used had horrible CA to point of the circling the retina/cornea border until about f/2.8.  My 50 f/1.4 on the other hand was great at f/2 as you can see in the example below:
EOS 1D X, 5DIII, M + EF 24 f/1.4II, 50 f/1.2, 85 f/1.2II, 300 f/2.8 IS II || 16-35 f/4 IS, 24-70 f/2.8II, 70-200 f/2.8II || TS-E 17 f/4, 24 f/3.5II || M 22 f/2, 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS || 1.4x III, 2x III

Sporgon

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1677
  • 5% of gear used 95% of the time
    • View Profile
    • www.buildingpanoramics.com
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2013, 02:40:02 PM »
What's all this talk of CAs ? You guys don't know your DxO. In their wonderfully condensed measurement rankings the 85 f1.8 has less CAs that all the rest.

OK so they test in the dark, but hey so what !? It's a 1.8 lens.

mackguyver

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2383
  • Who Dares Wins
    • View Profile
    • My Personal Work
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2013, 02:44:50 PM »
What's all this talk of CAs ? You guys don't know your DxO. In their wonderfully condensed measurement rankings the 85 f1.8 has less CAs that all the rest.

OK so they test in the dark, but hey so what !? It's a 1.8 lens.
More specifically I meant purple fringing, and from the sound of it, I must've had a really lousy copy.
EOS 1D X, 5DIII, M + EF 24 f/1.4II, 50 f/1.2, 85 f/1.2II, 300 f/2.8 IS II || 16-35 f/4 IS, 24-70 f/2.8II, 70-200 f/2.8II || TS-E 17 f/4, 24 f/3.5II || M 22 f/2, 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS || 1.4x III, 2x III

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2013, 02:44:50 PM »

Dave_NYC

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2013, 06:28:46 PM »

I'm glad to hear it's working so well for you and it's funny how each lens (and lens+body combination) can yield such different results.  The 85 1.2 II focuses very accurately, but it is painfully slow, no matter the light.  Maybe I didn't give the 1.8 enough time, but the copy I used had horrible CA to point of the circling the retina/cornea border until about f/2.8.  My 50 f/1.4 on the other hand was great at f/2 as you can see in the example below:

Hey, if it works for you, it's miller time. Or whatever beer you drink. If you drink beer.

Now I want a whiskey.

I'll freely admit I have not had very good luck with 50s. I really loved the color, sharpness, etc. of the Sigma 50 1.4 but the erratic auto focus was off by so much (and so unpredictably back and front focusing) that I couldn't use it with any confidence. Still bummed about it, because the glass was fantastic.

I think your bad luck with your 85 copy balanced out in a good way with your 50. If my 50 looked like that at F2 I'd keep it. Mine has too much of the 'dreamy' look to it (that to me looks less dreamy, more like slight milky blur - that's the best I can describe it).

tianxiaozhang

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 44
    • View Profile
Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #14 on: December 31, 2013, 01:10:30 AM »
I love my 85/1.8..

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« Reply #14 on: December 31, 2013, 01:10:30 AM »