October 24, 2014, 05:47:46 PM

Author Topic: New Sigma 18-200/f3.5-6.3 OS Macro or Canon EF-S 55-250/f4-5.6 IS STM?  (Read 1471 times)

fotorex

  • Guest
Hi,

which of these two lenses would you choose as a tele lens for the EOS M in combination with the EF Mount adaptor?

The Sigma lens specs seems tempting.

Sigma 18-200mm / f3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro
+ Macro functionality, 39cm min. focusing distance
+ only 86mm short
+ more versatile as it starts with 18mm (so you can leave the Kit lense at home)
- slower and shorter at the tele end
- 430gr weight
- 62mm thread diameter (a personal disadvantage for me as I don't have any lens with this diameter)
- more expensive (549€) than the Canon lens

Canon EF-S 55-250mm / f4-5.6 IS STM
+ STM (if needed)
+ 375gr weight
+ cheaper (290€) then the Sigma lens
- 111mm long
- no Macro functionality, 85cm min. focusing distance

What are your thoughts about these two lenses?

Regards,
Frank

canon rumors FORUM


neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ********
  • Posts: 14749
    • View Profile
Re: New Sigma 18-200/f3.5-6.3 OS Macro or Canon EF-S 55-250/f4-5.6 IS STM?
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2014, 04:38:50 PM »
I haven't looked at the Sigma, but superzoom lenses always involve compromises.  Usually, you're sacrificing IQ, you get lots of barrel distortion, and bad focus breathing (so with a close subject, the long end isn't as long as you think - the Canon 18-200 is more like 155mm at the long end with a subject a few feet away).  The only superzoom with very good IQ is still a compromise: it's big, heavy, and expensive - the 28-300L.

The 55-250 STM is reportedly a very good lens for the price (notably better than the non-STM versions).
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

JohanCruyff

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
I made a short test with my 70-200 F/4 IS L on my M, but the ergonomy was very poor and the autofocus slower than with EF-M lenses.
 
After reading positive reviews about the combo EOS M + Adapter + 55-250 IS STM, I ordered the new zoom lens: it's 6 centimeter shorter and weights much less.
 
I plan to take picture of relatively slow moving subjects this summer ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proboscis_monkey ), but I have a B-plan: if the autofocus and ergonomy are below my expectations, I will lend it to my daughters' 1100D / T3 Rebel.
 
 
Italian amateur. Gear: i) 5d Classic, 17-40 F/4 L, 24-105mm F/4 IS L, 100mm F/2.8 IS L, 70-200 F/4 IS L. & EOS M, 22 F/2, 18-55 + Mount Adapter, 55-250 F/4-5.6 IS STM
ii) Wife: Canon G12
iii) First Daughter: Canon 1100D, 18-55 IS iv) Son: Canon A1000IS v) Second Daughter: Nikon L21

DRR

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
I would choose the Canon. I have been disappointed with every superzoom I've used.

Jack of all trades is master of none.


wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4522
    • View Profile
so far the results from the 55-250 STM look pretty damn good and if you want wide the 11-22 is amazing

my main concern with the 55-250 STM would be AF speed as the STMs are noticably slow than USM even on the M...
APS-H Fanboy

canon rumors FORUM