you know I've gone full circle I really really wanted it and now I don't know.
is the Sigma 50 going to be on par with the Canon 100 L or is it new standard?
I have sharp lenses.
I'm not sure I get the comparison between a 50/1.4 and a 100/2.8
I'll bust out my depth of field calculator.... and it's broken.
I suppose my point is that if the 50 and the 100L at a similar depth of field are equal in sharpness and the pettiness of the bokeh... I may pass. I realize they are different focal lengths with different innate properties... but still. It the 50 v my new 135L. I suppose what I'm saying is that I was something transcendent for my money.
I just picked up the 100L macro and I don't find it that sharp, I was using it for portraits and I'm thinking I may go back to 85L and return the 100L. The sigma 35 is sharper then the 100L so there's a good chance the Sigma 50 will be sharper too. I need this bad boy to be released already.