December 20, 2014, 05:31:10 PM

Author Topic: Advice on Canon lenses  (Read 3550 times)

wsmith96

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 495
  • Gig 'em
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2014, 10:24:33 PM »
Thanks everyone for your comments - Im very lucky that I am able to get this gear at a great price so want to get it while I can.

Agree it will be heavy gear so I need to be smart about it.  So I think the 24-70mm f/2.8L + 70-200mm f/2.8L IS.  Also if I go down the Converter route - a 1.4X III or 2XIII ??

The Tilt shifts might be a little out of my range, but Im also considering some primes as well - still learning with these, so would love some advice on what range would be the best : 35mm f/2, 50mmf/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2.

I hear that the 35 f2 IS is a really good lens, but I don't have experience with it.  I use an 85mm F1.8 on a crop camera for indoor sports and it has served me very well.  I would love to see what this thing will do on a full frame... and I'll get my chance this weekend with a 5D Mk III.  I'll let you know what I think about it, but I know others on here have used this lens on a full frame.  Perhaps they can give you better feedback on it.
What I do today is important because I am exchanging a day of my life for it.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2014, 10:24:33 PM »

Hjalmarg1

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 339
  • Photo Hobbyist
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2014, 10:50:34 PM »
Thanks everyone for your comments - Im very lucky that I am able to get this gear at a great price so want to get it while I can.

Agree it will be heavy gear so I need to be smart about it.  So I think the 24-70mm f/2.8L + 70-200mm f/2.8L IS.  Also if I go down the Converter route - a 1.4X III or 2XIII ??

The Tilt shifts might be a little out of my range, but Im also considering some primes as well - still learning with these, so would love some advice on what range would be the best : 35mm f/2, 50mmf/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2.
With this combination (24-70mm f/2.8L + 70-200mm f/2.8L IS. and a 1.4X III or 2XIII) you are covering a full range of options and more.
I have the 35mm f/2 IS and I love it. It is lighter than the Canon f1.4 and Sigma f1.4. You loss I stop of light and some bokeh quality but you have 3-4 IS stops that really helps.
I also had in the past the 100mm f/2 and I used a lot for indoor sports with a 7D and the Sigma 85mm f1.4 that really rocks in terms of bokeh and IQ but, I sold them BOTH to buy the 100mm f/2.8L IS MACRO and I am very satisfied with my decision, no regreats at all. I can do portrait, macro, low light and more with this lens.
Body: 5DIII. Prime Lenses: 15mm f2.8, 100mm f2.8L IS, 35mm f2 IS, Extender EF 2X III.
Zoom Lenses: 16-35mm f4L IS, 24-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L IS II. Others: Flash 580EX II, 270EX II & MR-14EX II

JPAZ

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
  • If only I knew what I was doing.....
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2014, 11:18:21 PM »
First, congratulations.

Second, I moved from a 50d to the 5diii and you can see the stuff I have below.  But, travel is a whole different thing.  When I went to Denali, I took lot's of stuff.  When I went to Bosque del Apache, I took lot's of stuff along with a rented 300 2.8 and a 2x.  But when I travel and will be carrying my equipment rather than working out of a vehicle, my tried and true is the 17-70 + 24-104 + 70-200 f/4 IS.  I know there will be some folk dancing in low lighting or some Griffen Vulture way off in the distance or a cave temple that my 14 would be perfect for, but for almost all of my travel shots f/4 is wide enough and 24 through 200 should be a good enough range.  And this all goes into my Retrospective 7 making it handy and light enough to carry anywhere. 

So I can see why you want that range of lenses and certainly can't disagree with what everyone here has said, but look at your experience with the crop sensor, do some simple math, and then see what you really are willing to carry.

JP
5d Mkiii; Eos-M; too many lenses; 430 EXii and a whole lot of stuff

shhooter

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2014, 11:51:09 PM »
I have 5D3 + 50 f/1.4, 17-40, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 70-300 f/4-5.6L and don't even think about buying gear anymore. This kit does everything i need it to do and more.

24-70 f/2.8L II stays on about 90% of the time and i really only bring tele when traveling. Doubt i'll ever go back to primes after using the 24-70 II lens, it's much sharper than my 50 f/1.4 stopped down. However, it's also sick right now with Canon Service because of a coating defect...

For tele, the 70-200 2.8 is technically the better lens but for as little as i shoot long the 70-300L with its compact size + extra length is right for me. Note, the 70-300L does not fit the Canon extenders, but you can get the Kenko 1.4 and it works great on the 5D3, AF isn't even terribly affected. Carry a 70-200 2.8 around for a bit before buying one to see if it's right for you, it's a seriously big lens and calls a lot of attention to itself which is not desirable when traveling.

Eldar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1762
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #19 on: February 13, 2014, 04:02:21 AM »
Weight will be a consideration if your doing a load of travelling, especially by air, keep the package as light as possible.

5DMK III Body
24-70 f/2.8 L II
70-200 f/2.8 L II
TSE 24 f/3.5 f/3.5 L II
600 EX-RT Flash
1.4X III Converter (gives your 70-200f/2.8 280 f/4) at the long end & little to no loss of IQ)

All this into a Guru Gear Bataflea 26L Camera Bag, your about as well rigged as you will want to be, for a while.

The 24 TSE will not only do your architecture better then anything else, it's an amazingly sharp Lens & just about perfect for Landscape.

I have the 70-300f/4-f/5.6, not so impressed, OK IQ & light to Carry, but you can't use the Canon Converters with it, noir a bad lens, I'm just not convinced it's in the same league as the other lenses mentioned above.

Good Luck & enjoy.
Except for the bag, which I don't know, I could have written this. But to add something, I would consider a fast prime, either a 35 or 50 f1.4.
5DIII, 1DX, 8-15/4L, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 70-300/4-5.6L IS, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, Zeiss 15/2.8, 17/4L TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8, 24/3.5L TS-E II, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss Otus 55/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85/1.4, 100/2.8L IS Macro, Zeiss 135/2, 600/4L IS II

traveller

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 661
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2014, 05:11:14 AM »
The best way to know what you need to buy, is to know the limitations of your current kit; what is it about your current kit that you don't like? Don't just say "image quality", be specific: the 50D is capable of making stunning images and whilst the 18-200 doesn't have the best reputation, it isn't a total dog at all focal length-aperture combinations.

I am not writing this to make the old clich├ęd suggestion like "Ansel Adams could make a masterpiece with a box-brownie", but rather to get you to think about where the weaknesses of your current kit lie. If you are annoyed that your images at focal length xx are soft, then you know that this is an area that is important to you and that you should spend money to cover. If you complain that the 50D produces noisy images, this suggests that you are working at the limits of your camera ISO range and lens aperture: the 5D Mk.III will obviously help, but you'll benefit just as much from faster lenses; likewise, if you are struggling to get shallow depth of field. If you want 22MP to help you crop images, perhaps you need longer lenses.

I'm sorry if you were looking for a "just buy the xx-xx and xx-xxx" type of reply. If that's the case, then I'd suggest that you already know what you want and that you should just go ahead and buy it! All the lenses suggested on this thread vary from very good to excellent and I doubt any will truly disappoint. Just be aware that the more lenses you own, the more you'll end up carrying; I wouldn't want your photography to move from being fun to becoming a chore!

NancyP

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2014, 02:08:15 PM »
If you want inconspicuous and light, I would consider the Shorty Forty 40mm f/2.8 STM or for more money the 35mm f/2 IS . People are more relaxed around a smaller camera. People tend to crowd around if they see a Big White hanging off your camera, plus when you travel you should be conscious of thieves who grab and run when they see fancy-looking cameras.

Save money for a good pack and a good tripod.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2014, 02:08:15 PM »

PikkieChick

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #22 on: February 18, 2014, 04:28:14 AM »
After much debate & hanging out in a camera store carrying around the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS on a 5D3, I think I've decided to flag the 70-200mm f/2.8 due to the weight.

I think I'm now looking at for my 5D3:
17-40 / 24-70 f2.8L II / 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS
I was also considering the 24-105 f/4L IS USM as a general walk around lens with a bit of extra reach over the 24-70mm f/2.8L ll

The other combinations is to ditch the 24-105 & get the 16-35mm instead of the 17-40mm, so:
16-35 / 24-70 f2.8L II / 70-300 f4-5.6L IS

Thoughts anyone ?
« Last Edit: February 18, 2014, 05:27:57 AM by PikkieChick »

Eldar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1762
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #23 on: February 18, 2014, 05:03:51 AM »
That is a very good troika. You may want to add a fast prime (or two) over time though. The new Sigma 50mm ART could be highly interesting (if it is worth the pre release hype).

The 70-200 f2.8L IS II is definitely superior to the 70-300, but the 70-300 is also a very good lens and underrated by many. I use it a lot on travel, because of its compact size.

The 17-40 is a lot of lens for the money, but I would rather have a fast UWA prime, probably a Zeiss.
5DIII, 1DX, 8-15/4L, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 70-300/4-5.6L IS, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, Zeiss 15/2.8, 17/4L TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8, 24/3.5L TS-E II, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss Otus 55/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85/1.4, 100/2.8L IS Macro, Zeiss 135/2, 600/4L IS II

PikkieChick

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #24 on: February 18, 2014, 05:33:04 AM »
The 17-40 is a lot of lens for the money, but I would rather have a fast UWA prime, probably a Zeiss.

Yes agree re Primes and I will do that once I see what focal lengths I use the most.  What about the 16-35mm instead of the 17-40mm ?

Eldar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1762
    • View Profile
    • Flickr
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #25 on: February 18, 2014, 05:45:03 AM »
The 17-40 is a lot of lens for the money, but I would rather have a fast UWA prime, probably a Zeiss.

Yes agree re Primes and I will do that once I see what focal lengths I use the most.  What about the 16-35mm instead of the 17-40mm ?
The 16-35 is a much bdebated lens. It gives you one extra stop, but at a considerable price difference. An advantage is that it has the same 82mm filter size as the 24-70 II. The IQ difference at f5.6 is neglectable. The 17-40 is smaller and lighter. They both have edge softness and CA issues, which is why I prefer the 15mm Zeiss and 17mm TS-E lenses.

It is important to think through what you will use it for. I rarely use wider than 24mm if people are in the frame, due to distortion.
5DIII, 1DX, 8-15/4L, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 70-300/4-5.6L IS, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, Zeiss 15/2.8, 17/4L TS-E, Zeiss 21/2.8, 24/3.5L TS-E II, Zeiss 35/1.4, Zeiss Otus 55/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85/1.4, 100/2.8L IS Macro, Zeiss 135/2, 600/4L IS II

bholliman

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 800
    • View Profile
Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2014, 07:17:55 AM »
The 24-70 2.8 II and 70-300L are two terrific lenses.  If size and weight are really important for travel, you may consider the 24-70 F/4 IS instead of the 2.8 II, as it's much lighter and nearly as good optically.  If you did this, I would defiantly recommend a fast prime 35-85mm) as well, as with two f/4 zooms, your ability to shoot shallow DOF would be somewhat limited.

The 17-40 is a lot of lens for the money, but I would rather have a fast UWA prime, probably a Zeiss.

Yes agree re Primes and I will do that once I see what focal lengths I use the most.  What about the 16-35mm instead of the 17-40mm ?

It is important to think through what you will use it for. I rarely use wider than 24mm if people are in the frame, due to distortion.

This is excellent advice.  I rarely shoot wider than 24mm, so decided to go with the inexpensive Rokinon 14mm 2.8 instead of one of the more expensive UWA zooms that are really not particularly good IMHO.  The Zeiss 15mm and 21mm as well as the 17 TSE are other great options depending on how much you want to spend.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2014, 07:27:12 AM by bholliman »
Bodies:  6D, EOS-M
EF Lenses: 35mm f/2.0 IS, 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, 135mm f/2.0L, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-70mm f/2.8L II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II; EF-M Lenses: 22 f/2, 18-55
Speedlites: ST-E3-RT, 600EX-RT (x3)

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Advice on Canon lenses
« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2014, 07:17:55 AM »