Why do you think, did Sigma for only for a f/1.4 rather than down to the f/1.2 of the Canon L 50mm ?
Because it's going to be 815g with f/1.4
The extra glass for top performance at f/1.2 would have been an overkill. I'm more surprised that Zeiss didn't go for f/1.2 considering they definitely had the budget.
I am hoping that this lens is going to be pretty sweet at f/1.4...and focus fast. I think that the size and the ensuing focusing issues, oh..and cost of an f/1.2 lens...would be offsetting. I don't think f/1.2 is necessary if this lens is what we are hoping that it is. I am just excited that they are making this lens..REALLY excited!!!!! The lens makers have been asleep for decades regarding this FF normal lens situation.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2014, 03:22:28 AM by infared »
5D III +BG, 5D IV +BG, Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Rokinon 15mm f/2.4, Canon 17mm f/4L TS-E, Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS, Sigma 20mm f/1.4 Art, Canon 35mm f/1.4L II, Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art, Canon 85mm f/1.2L, Canon 100mm f/2.8L Macro, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II & 1.4x III