See the idiotic comment at the end. I sent in a comment 2 days ago but it is awaiting moderation............
I agree, the guy is very biased. Never mentions how it compares to the 1DX, or even mentions the 1DX. Could that be because he's never used one? I can only guess that he has not. Obviously he's a committed Nikon and Ashton Kutcher lover.
Have any of you...anyone on Canon Rumors' forum...seen an unbiased test of the D4s, or better yet, a comparison of it and the 1DX?
I suspect there are things it might do better than the 1DX, but I doubt it can autofocus better...and it certainly still can't shoot as many fps. Seems like the only definite thing it can do better, is last longer on a battery. And why is that? Does it not use the same 18650 tri-cell pack? If so...it seems to me that a camera would last longer, if its digital processing used less energy. And that could at least partly be because, it has less processing power...It needs less for one basic reason. It has 16 MP vs. 18 MP...but also, the processor that controls autofocus, very likely uses a lot less power than the 1DX's autofocus processor (it's a "Digic 4").
I suspect that the 1DX replacement, probably still won't last as long on a charge, as the D4s, even if it has more efficient processing and better batteries...because Canon will still opt for the maximum processing they can cram in there!