September 19, 2017, 08:28:49 PM

Author Topic: Tele-lens on a budget  (Read 4941 times)

gekko

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 23
Re: Tele-lens on a budget
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2014, 01:32:09 AM »
As soon as you say "BIF", the 400f5.6 should really be first in line.
The 400f5.6 is also very light for what you get. Basically you cannot do better if straight "BIF" is what you are after.
Thank you. That seems to be the conclusion I'm reaching myself as well.  :D
Canon EOS 80D, EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II, EF 400mm f/5.6L, EF 135mm f/2.0L, EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6, EF 1.4x III

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Tele-lens on a budget
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2014, 01:32:09 AM »

9VIII

  • EOS-1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1573
Re: Tele-lens on a budget
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2014, 02:18:27 PM »
As soon as you say "BIF", the 400f5.6 should really be first in line.
The 400f5.6 is also very light for what you get. Basically you cannot do better if straight "BIF" is what you are after.
Thank you. That seems to be the conclusion I'm reaching myself as well.  :D

That lens is such a special piece that the lack of an equivalent in any other mount is the primary reason my gear set is Canon exclusive.
I almost want to get another and glue a TC onto it (which should theoretically produce a completely weathersealed lens), but fingers crossed the (rumored) 100-400 upgrade will be something spectacular, and we have the SX50HS successor to check into for super(ultra)telephoto options.

slclick

  • EOS-1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1981
Re: Tele-lens on a budget
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2014, 02:33:41 PM »
400 5.6 or the BigRon.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Tele-lens on a budget
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2014, 02:33:41 PM »