November 23, 2014, 11:30:44 AM

Author Topic: DxO Review of Sigma 50mm 1.4 DG HSM Art  (Read 468 times)

mackguyver

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3017
  • Who Dares Wins
    • View Profile
    • My Personal Work
DxO Review of Sigma 50mm 1.4 DG HSM Art
« on: April 17, 2014, 11:02:32 AM »
Review

It looks like the only real surprise is the TStop of 1.7.  Not a big deal, but a bit unexpected given the TStop of 1.5 for the Sigma 35A.

Comparison to the Canon 50L and 1.4
« Last Edit: April 17, 2014, 11:10:41 AM by mackguyver »

canon rumors FORUM

DxO Review of Sigma 50mm 1.4 DG HSM Art
« on: April 17, 2014, 11:02:32 AM »

Rudeofus

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Re: DxO Review of Sigma 50mm 1.4 DG HSM Art
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2014, 11:20:29 AM »
Since all of these fast lenses have severe vignetting wide open, I wonder how they measure T stops. Do they measure average across the whole frame, or only in the center, or somewhere in between these two extremes?

mackguyver

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 3017
  • Who Dares Wins
    • View Profile
    • My Personal Work
Re: DxO Review of Sigma 50mm 1.4 DG HSM Art
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2014, 11:24:44 AM »
It looks like they measure it across the frame, and they don't mention vignette compensation:
http://www.dxomark.com/About/In-depth-measurements/DxOMark-testing-protocols/Light-transmission

Rudeofus

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Re: DxO Review of Sigma 50mm 1.4 DG HSM Art
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2014, 04:34:05 AM »
It looks like they measure it across the frame, and they don't mention vignette compensation:

That would explain why a slow IS zoom like the 24-70 F/4 IS has T=4 whereas all fast lenses have T stop significantly above their largest aperture. In other words, this T stop number is a poor substitute for their vignetting number and as such should be considered most useless.

Very confused ...

canon rumors FORUM

Re: DxO Review of Sigma 50mm 1.4 DG HSM Art
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2014, 04:34:05 AM »