May 19, 2013, 08:49:50 AM

Author Topic: Imatest resolution question - lens testing  (Read 1462 times)

JR

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1239
    • View Profile
Imatest resolution question - lens testing
« on: November 07, 2011, 07:57:15 AM »
This may seem like a stupid question!  When we go on www.photozone.de to look at lens test and then compare resolution charts for each lens that are based on the Imatest (LW/PH), it make sense if I only look at Canon lens say done with a FF camera.

Where I am puzzle is why when I also look at the same test for a similar Nikon lens also done on a full frame camera the LW/PH and hence the resolution always seem higher (the graphs always show a higher number).  I thought that with the 5D at 21MP and Nikon FF being at 12MP these test would almost always show Canon lens having higher resolution.

Does anyone understand the differences?  Am I comparing apple to oranges here?  Thanks in advance for your response...
1DX, 24mm f1.4L II, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L II, 135mm f2L, 24-70mm f2.8L II, 70-200mm f2.8L IS II :  D800, D4, 24 1.4G, 35 1.4G, 50 1.4G, 85 1.4G, 24-70 2.8, 70-200 2.8 VR II

canon rumors FORUM

Imatest resolution question - lens testing
« on: November 07, 2011, 07:57:15 AM »

ferdi

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile
Re: Imatest resolution question - lens testing
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2011, 08:51:31 AM »
As the Photozone team explains in their FAQ, the LW/PH value is hard to compare across systems:
http://photozone.de/Reviews/lens-test-faq
Quote
LW/PH [...] [is] basically a unit for resolution (not sharpness which is a combination of contrast and resolution) limited by the max. resolution of the camera's image sensor. You shouldn't take the LW/PH value itself too seriously because it is dependent on a number of factors. The analyzing tool (Imatest) is quite vulnerable to the quality of the source material.
[...]
In the future we will probably drop the LW/PHs in favor of a school mark system which is easier to read. Refer to the reference scale on the left of the MTF charts to classify the quality.

So just look at the good/very good/ex rating.
1D IV, 5D II, 16-35L II, 24-70L II, 24-105L, 70-200L IS II, 300L IS, Σ 50, Σ 85, 1.4x III, 580EX II, 600EX-RT

J. McCabe

  • Guest
Re: Imatest resolution question - lens testing
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2011, 08:55:52 AM »
This may seem like a stupid question!  When we go on www.photozone.de to look at lens test and then compare resolution charts for each lens that are based on the Imatest (LW/PH), it make sense if I only look at Canon lens say done with a FF camera.

Where I am puzzle is why when I also look at the same test for a similar Nikon lens also done on a full frame camera the LW/PH and hence the resolution always seem higher (the graphs always show a higher number).  I thought that with the 5D at 21MP and Nikon FF being at 12MP these test would almost always show Canon lens having higher resolution.

Does anyone understand the differences?  Am I comparing apple to oranges here?  Thanks in advance for your response...

Possibly the tests were done on the Nikon D3X, which has a 24MP sensor ?

JR

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1239
    • View Profile
Re: Imatest resolution question - lens testing
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2011, 10:28:57 AM »
Oops!  You are right most of them are done with the D3x which has 24MP so that would explain it I guess.  I also understand I should not compare like for like different system but was just curious.

Thanks for pointing that out...
1DX, 24mm f1.4L II, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L II, 135mm f2L, 24-70mm f2.8L II, 70-200mm f2.8L IS II :  D800, D4, 24 1.4G, 35 1.4G, 50 1.4G, 85 1.4G, 24-70 2.8, 70-200 2.8 VR II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Imatest resolution question - lens testing
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2011, 10:28:57 AM »