Thanks for sharing. Those corners look real good
How many non-CR members viewing these shots would comment on the corners :-> ... esp. with closed aperture and this export size I'm pretty sure you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between 17-40L, 16-35L/24 and the new 16-35L/4, Canon should have done comparison shots :-)
I believe Dylan made a "That looks promising.." comment. Not a "Wow that´s awesome, I want one!" comment ...
And the shots are promotion, not a review. They are still going to sell both the 17-40 and 16-35 2.8, so why on earth should they hand out comparison shots to kill one or two of them? Would not be a smart career move for anyone in marketing, unless the motivation was to stop all sales of one model and jump start a new.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2014, 10:22:42 AM by Eldar »
1DXII, 5DIV, 5DSR, 8-15/4L, 11-24/4L, 16-35/2.8L III, 24-70/28L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 100-400/4.5-5.6L IS II, 200-400/4L IS 1.4x, 17/3.5L TS-E, 24/4L TS-E, 35/1.4L II, 100/2.8L IS Macro, 300/2.8L IS II, 600/4L IS II, Zeiss: 15/2.8, 35/1.4, 55/1.4 Otus, 85/1.4 Otus, Profoto B1