Rumors > Lenses

EF 24-70 f/2.8L Replacement [CR2]

<< < (10/10)

kubelik:
dilbert, the guys over at luminous landscape would have to disagree:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/24-70-review.shtml

at least to me, I value the opinion of actual in-the-field shooters a heck of a lot more than I value DXOmark scores, which, to put it politely, I consider a bunch of hogwash

dilbert:

--- Quote from: kubelik on October 19, 2010, 07:10:04 AM ---dilbert, the guys over at luminous landscape would have to disagree:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/24-70-review.shtml

at least to me, I value the opinion of actual in-the-field shooters a heck of a lot more than I value DXOmark scores, which, to put it politely, I consider a bunch of hogwash

--- End quote ---


To quote Michael:


--- Quote ---Nothing scientific — not even terribly sophisticated, but hopefully enough to determine whether — other than the wider coverage — the new lens was in any way superior to the old one.

--- End quote ---


DXO's testing is the exact opposite - scientific. Their goal is to measure a lens so that their software can make corrections for lens imperfections.

DXO confirmed that the 24-70 is sharper than  the 28-70 but in some other areas, it is not as good.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page