Well I have 34 years of providing for myself and family by producing images, so I suppose you could say I know nothing.
On the other hand I could point you to the various articles, comments and such that point out the many inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and unmentioned "editing" (rewriting of the "facts") that have been made about DxO. Or that they claim to be scientists with scientific methods but won't actually share how they arrive at their end scores, so nobody, scientist or not, can check their "work"/opinions. Or point out, again, that they are claiming the physically impossible, nothing is perfect, not even a Zeiss 135.
But my dear dilbert, like the cartoon, you have proven to be a frustrating person to have a conversation with, you avoid direct questions (Does a 70D pixel enlarge as well as a 1Dx pixel?), rebuttals, and facts that don't align with your opinion, you change the subject, throw up strawman arguments, and seek to deliberately misrepresent what people say in their counter positions.
Bearing that in mind, I don't really care what your opinion is, or about the fact that DxO have embarrassed themselves as "scientists" yet again by claiming the physically impossible.