December 20, 2014, 10:35:31 PM

Author Topic: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...  (Read 21258 times)

ahsanford

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1069
    • View Profile
Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« on: June 26, 2014, 02:34:50 PM »
And Bryan Carnathan at TDP is first:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=9939

Please post links to any reviews that you see on this thread.  My rental of this lens just arrived -- can't wait to put it through it's paces this weekend.

- A

canon rumors FORUM

Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« on: June 26, 2014, 02:34:50 PM »

Maximilian

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 505
  • The dark side - I've been there
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2014, 03:20:16 AM »
And Bryan Carnathan at TDP is first:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=9939

Please post links to any reviews that you see on this thread.  My rental of this lens just arrived -- can't wait to put it through it's paces this weekend.

- A
Thanks for sharing.

I am pretty impressed how well it is at f4 already. especially compared to the 16-35 F/2.8L II
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=949&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=2&API=0&LensComp=412&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=2&APIComp=2

If I would go more into this focal range, I definetly would want it. Having the 17-40L already, it's too much money to spend. But maybe someday... *sigh*
sometimes you have to close your eyes to see properly.

ahsanford

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1069
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2014, 10:54:32 AM »

Basic unboxing and first test shots from DP Review:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3690354#forum-post-53917409

JPEGs are in the story, but there is a Flickr link to full res in the first comment below the story.

- A



vlim

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
    • View Profile

dilbert

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 3289
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2014, 12:30:01 PM »
Yup, in terms of IQ, this lens just blows away the 16-35 and 17-40.

If you've still got one of those two lenses, you could try giving it away for free because they're not really worth having now.

Ruined

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 653
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2014, 01:05:59 PM »
Yup, in terms of IQ, this lens just blows away the 16-35 and 17-40.

If you've still got one of those two lenses, you could try giving it away for free because they're not really worth having now.

Unless you are a professional that does events.  Better corner sharpness from f/4-f/8 is not worth losing f/2.8.  IS can't help motion blur.

dilbert

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 3289
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2014, 01:51:50 PM »
Yup, in terms of IQ, this lens just blows away the 16-35 and 17-40.

If you've still got one of those two lenses, you could try giving it away for free because they're not really worth having now.

Unless you are a professional that does events.  Better corner sharpness from f/4-f/8 is not worth losing f/2.8.  IS can't help motion blur.

Lets see. The trade off is 1 stop of ISO for sharp across the frame.

And if you need 24/28/35 at f/2.8, Canon now has three primes with IS.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2014, 01:54:48 PM by dilbert »

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2014, 01:51:50 PM »

ahsanford

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1069
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2014, 02:06:57 PM »
Yup, in terms of IQ, this lens just blows away the 16-35 and 17-40.

If you've still got one of those two lenses, you could try giving it away for free because they're not really worth having now.

Unless you are a professional that does events.  Better corner sharpness from f/4-f/8 is not worth losing f/2.8.  IS can't help motion blur.

Lets see. The trade off is 1 stop of ISO for sharp across the frame.

And if you need 24/28/35 at f/2.8, Canon now has three primes with IS.

Dilbert, I agree with your tradeoff math and will probably buy the new lens, but if you are shooting moving subjects, sharp corners mean little if your subject is blurry from too slow of a shutter speed.   :P

- A


neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 15227
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2014, 02:23:53 PM »
...if you are shooting moving subjects, sharp corners mean little if your subject is blurry from too slow of a shutter speed.

+1

I have the 70-200/2.8L IS II instead of the smaller/lighter/cheaper f/4 version for the extra stop of shutter speed.
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

Ruined

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 653
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2014, 02:24:02 PM »
Yup, in terms of IQ, this lens just blows away the 16-35 and 17-40.

If you've still got one of those two lenses, you could try giving it away for free because they're not really worth having now.

Unless you are a professional that does events.  Better corner sharpness from f/4-f/8 is not worth losing f/2.8.  IS can't help motion blur.

Lets see. The trade off is 1 stop of ISO for sharp across the frame.

And if you need 24/28/35 at f/2.8, Canon now has three primes with IS.

In the range I personally have in addition to the 16-35mm f/2.8L II, the 24mm f/1.4L and a 35mm f/2 IS USM.  But, neither is a zoom (helpful at receptions), and neither can do 16-23mm.  I also have the 24-70mm f/2.8L II, which is a zoom - but once again cannot do wider than 24mm.  Hence, the importance of the 16-35mm f/2.8L II.  I don't want to be stuck with the limitations of a f/4 lens.  Also, the corner sharpness is unimportant when taking pictures of people as you need to put them in the center of the frame to avoid perspective distortion anyway in most of this focal length - center sharpness is far more critical.  Also, IS for my needs is virtually useless below 70mm as my shutter will usually be 1/100 to avoid motion blur.

Believe me, if I didn't think I needed f/2.8 on the 16-35, I would sell the f/2.8L II on eBay as even today it sells for more used than the 16-35 f/4 IS costs new at full MSRP - I would essentially be able to do a swap with no net loss.  But, I don't want to be put in the situation where I need 16-23mm f/2.8 and have to take a compromised picture because I don't have it.

Finally, note that the 16-35 f/2.8L II is actually sharp across the frame at f/11 (and pretty close at f/8).  So if you have this lens, all you have to do is stop down - which you probably would be doing for DOF in landscape anyway.  f/4 is really where the 16-35 f/2.8L II gets trounced in sharpness by the 16-35 f/4 IS, but that is the aperture that would likely be least used by either event or landscape photographers - too slow for event photographers, not enough DOF for landscape.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2014, 02:42:01 PM by Ruined »

Hjalmarg1

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 339
  • Photo Hobbyist
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2014, 02:36:17 PM »
And Bryan Carnathan at TDP is first:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=9939

Please post links to any reviews that you see on this thread.  My rental of this lens just arrived -- can't wait to put it through it's paces this weekend.

- A

Also see the review on the Photography Blog website. http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_ef_16_35mm_f4_l_is_usm_review/
They come to the same conclusions. Enjoy
Body: 5DIII. Prime Lenses: 15mm f2.8, 100mm f2.8L IS, 35mm f2 IS, Extender EF 2X III.
Zoom Lenses: 16-35mm f4L IS, 24-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L IS II. Others: Flash 580EX II, 270EX II & MR-14EX II

ahsanford

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1069
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2014, 04:16:09 PM »

Finally, note that the 16-35 f/2.8L II is actually sharp across the frame at f/11 (and pretty close at f/8).  So if you have this lens, all you have to do is stop down - which you probably would be doing for DOF in landscape anyway.  f/4 is really where the 16-35 f/2.8L II gets trounced in sharpness by the 16-35 f/4 IS, but that is the aperture that would likely be least used by either event or landscape photographers - too slow for event photographers, not enough DOF for landscape.
Have a look at these comparisons at F/11, though.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Comparisons/Canon-EF-16-35mm-f-4-L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx
(mouseover the aperture values to see the pictures change)

I would not call that "sharp across the frame" for the F/2.8 lens.  At 16mm, the F/4 lens is very slightly better in the corners at F/11.  And at 24mm and 35mm, it's clearly better.  The new zoom even fares well against a Zeiss prime on that same page.

The one distinction is why a boatload of landscape people will buy the new F/4 lens. No Canon UWA zoom has delivered sharp corners... until possibly now.  I'd like a few more reviews corroborating TDP's findings, but I'm optimistic.

- A

rs

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 694
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2014, 05:41:03 PM »
Also see the review on the Photography Blog website. http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_ef_16_35mm_f4_l_is_usm_review/
They come to the same conclusions. Enjoy

I'm confused. I thought it was an EF mount lens:

Quote from: photographyblog.com
It has no aperture ring, which is no big deal unless you wanted to use it on a very old film body.

 :o
5D II | 24-70 II | 70-200 II | 100L | 40 | Sigma 50/1.4 | 40D | 10-22 | 17-55 | 580 EX II | 1.4x TC II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2014, 05:41:03 PM »

dilbert

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 3289
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2014, 07:06:53 PM »

Finally, note that the 16-35 f/2.8L II is actually sharp across the frame at f/11 (and pretty close at f/8).  So if you have this lens, all you have to do is stop down - which you probably would be doing for DOF in landscape anyway.  f/4 is really where the 16-35 f/2.8L II gets trounced in sharpness by the 16-35 f/4 IS, but that is the aperture that would likely be least used by either event or landscape photographers - too slow for event photographers, not enough DOF for landscape.
Have a look at these comparisons at F/11, though.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Comparisons/Canon-EF-16-35mm-f-4-L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx
(mouseover the aperture values to see the pictures change)

I would not call that "sharp across the frame" for the F/2.8 lens.  At 16mm, the F/4 lens is very slightly better in the corners at F/11.  And at 24mm and 35mm, it's clearly better.  The new zoom even fares well against a Zeiss prime on that same page.

The one distinction is why a boatload of landscape people will buy the new F/4 lens. No Canon UWA zoom has delivered sharp corners... until possibly now.  I'd like a few more reviews corroborating TDP's findings, but I'm optimistic.

Every review/poster of samples has shown similar IQ.

ahsanford

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1069
    • View Profile
Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2014, 08:24:17 PM »
Every review/poster of samples has shown similar IQ.

(inferring what you meant) similar IQ... between the two lenses?   

If so, I refer you to my prior post.  I think Carnathan's shots show a clear corner sharpness improvement for the new lens at 24mm and 35mm -- even at F/11.  At 16mm, I'd say the shots are a pretty much a draw if you stop down to F/11.

(if that's not what you meant, apologies -- wasn't sure)


And we should expect a sharper lens based on those MTF charts, right?

- A

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2014, 08:24:17 PM »