April 18, 2015, 09:19:14 PM

Author Topic: Lensrentals Canon UWA FF lens comparison  (Read 1095 times)

traveller

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 672
Lensrentals Canon UWA FF lens comparison
« on: July 30, 2014, 11:49:46 AM »
Roger Cicala does another short comparison  ;)

http://www.lensrentals.com/blog

canon rumors FORUM

Lensrentals Canon UWA FF lens comparison
« on: July 30, 2014, 11:49:46 AM »

Mt Spokane Photography

  • EF 50mm F 0.7 IS
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10027
Re: Lensrentals Canon UWA FF lens comparison
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2014, 08:29:21 PM »
Nice article as usual.  The lens is more impressive than I had thought.

Vern

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 169
Re: Lensrentals Canon UWA FF lens comparison
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2014, 10:29:28 PM »
I'll hold off until more f8 results come out. My rationale being that I use the 16-35II 2.8 in two ways - low light people photography in tight settings (need 2.8, tack-sharpness less important since motion blur will be the image limiting effect) and landscape (shot at f8-11 where it appears the 16-35II 2.8 is not far behind the new 16-35IS 4.0). IS on a wide angle is not a big deal to me since I have steady hands and can shoot at 1/10 sec at 16-35 mm with a decent keeper rate, and if I'm shooting landscape, I mostly use a tripod anyway.

All this said, the new 24-70II 2.8 is so sharp that I now debate whether to carry my 24TS II every time I shoot landscape. If I'm not planning on TS movements, the 24-70II seems just as sharp and obviously quicker/more flexible. Maybe the 16-35IS 4.0 is so much better optically than the 2.8 that I will get it just for landscape. f 8.0 will tell (looks similar on the IQ tests from the digital picture site). Make sense?
1Dx, 5DMKIII, 600 II, 300 II, 200 f2, 135 f2, 85 1.2 II, 100 2.8 IS, 24TS II, 70-200 II, 24-70 II, 16-35 II, 100-400 II

Dylan777

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 4705
Re: Lensrentals Canon UWA FF lens comparison
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2014, 10:54:33 PM »
Nice article as usual.  The lens is more impressive than I had thought.

+1...Always enjoy their reviews.
Bodies: 1DX -- A7s
Primes: FE28 f2 -- FE55 f1.8 -- 85L II -- 200L f2 IS -- 400L f2.8 IS II
Zooms: 100-400L II

Click

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *********
  • Posts: 4328
Re: Lensrentals Canon UWA FF lens comparison
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2014, 11:06:33 PM »
Very good review. Thanks for the link.

millan

  • Power Shot G7X
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Photography is a kind of magic...
    • mm.art.photo
A nice UWA lenses comparison
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2014, 02:54:51 AM »
Lensrentals.com made a nice comparison of UWA lenses:
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2014/07/canon-wide-angle-zoom-comparison




Vossie

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 325
Re: A nice UWA lenses comparison
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2014, 04:13:58 AM »
Very nice comparison indeed. Roger always does a very thorough job. The new 16-35 f4 seems to be a real gem.

Especially this bit says a lot: "The MTF charts clearly show the TS-E is better at . . . tilting and shifting. That’s huge for me, because I often used it as a straight lens, never intending to use the tilt-shift features, simply because of its resolution."
5D3, 16-35LII, 24-70 2.8LII, 24-105L, 85LII, 70-200 2.8LII, 100L, 135L, 100-400L, 50 1.4, 40 2.8, Sigma 180 3.5 EX, 1.4x TC III, 600EX, 550EX

canon rumors FORUM

Re: A nice UWA lenses comparison
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2014, 04:13:58 AM »