QuoteDid you even read the entire post?
yeah yeah your workarounds are nice.
They're not just nice, they work. If I could buy a 36 MP DSLR and a T/S lens and consistently produce larger, more detailed prints then I can now for less then I would have to spend on a MF body alone, why wouldn't I?
And again I will point out that diffraction does not hit any format more than any other, and I don't often jump through special hoops to get the full 18 MP out of APS-C. That means I could be getting 45 MP out of FF if it was available.
f/11 should work actually.
that would be a near limit of 1.62m if my tables are correct.[/quote]
DoF calculator shows f/11 would just work with a focus distance of 5.7 ft. In the field it's not always possible to be so precise so you would probably be at f/13 for that example. But it is an extreme example.
what i think is that the "leaves counter" are to enthusiastic when it comes to more MP.
itÂ´s not as if you get the 36MP for free.
I'm not counting leaves. I want larger prints and I'm on a budget.