Image & Video Galleries > Landscape

Pano - Rochester, UK

(1/4) > >>

briansquibb:
Full size - 47mb, 15301 x 4614, 6 images stitched

1D4, 400 f/2.8

http://www.squibb.org.uk/pictures/rochester.JPG

JR:
Very Nice!  I downloaded the full 47M image and it is so big I felt I was there!  I assume you used a tripod for the 6 shot?

Mendolera:
brainsquibb, Im also live in Rochester but NY that is :)

Anyways very cool photo!

briansquibb:

--- Quote from: JR on December 22, 2011, 02:37:27 PM ---Very Nice!  I downloaded the full 47M image and it is so big I felt I was there!  I assume you used a tripod for the 6 shot?

--- End quote ---

Yes - it was a 1D4 with a 400 f/2.8 IS on a Manfrotto 055XPROB and Manfrotto Gimbal

I am experimenting with using the 400 for landscapes - of course it is a bit long so I that I have to stitch several together to get the width

JR:

--- Quote from: briansquibb on December 22, 2011, 02:48:32 PM ---
--- Quote from: JR on December 22, 2011, 02:37:27 PM ---Very Nice!  I downloaded the full 47M image and it is so big I felt I was there!  I assume you used a tripod for the 6 shot?

--- End quote ---

Yes - it was a 1D4 with a 400 f/2.8 IS on a Manfrotto 055XPROB and Manfrotto Gimbal

I am experimenting with using the 400 for landscapes - of course it is a bit long so I that I have to stitch several together to get the width

--- End quote ---

What was your main motivation for trying the 400 for landscape?  DOF?  IQ?  Just curious...I dont have long focal lenght like this but recently I noticed my 85mm did great at landscape (better then my 50 or 24).  I am tempted to try my 70-200 at 200mm for landscape now...  Anyway curious to know your thought process...

Thanks

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version