December 06, 2016, 11:23:17 AM

Author Topic: C 300 is not an alternative to 35mm motion picture film.  (Read 5953 times)

ssrdd

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
Re: C 300 is not an alternative to 35mm motion picture film.
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2012, 03:16:22 AM »
we keep on argue for this confused ideas in canons mind!!!
other side nikon has an uncompressed video in dslr.

canon is to even in the competition with 1dx or c300 agent nikon.
appreciate nikon for not playing any cheap games like canon.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: C 300 is not an alternative to 35mm motion picture film.
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2012, 03:16:22 AM »

NotABunny

  • Guest
Re: C 300 is not an alternative to 35mm motion picture film.
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2012, 05:43:07 AM »
I just saw Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, and was again reminded how muddy the RED makes images look.

When I saw the movie, I thought "Holly smokes, and we have to watch that Hollywood crap images with all that digital noise?!" That movie showed me that the the future doesn't include any more "oh, but 24p and noisy images is what gives movies that special look!"

canon rumors FORUM

Re: C 300 is not an alternative to 35mm motion picture film.
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2012, 05:43:07 AM »