+ 100Making the 24-70 2.8 L an IS would imo be the same like offering a 24 105 L IS at F 2.8 both would be as expensive as a 70-200 L II IS USM. The 24-105 would surely cost even more. But a lense is bought for a decade. That is no big investment at least. If it costs $ 1000 more that would make 8-10 bucks a month. One (huge) pizza less. Or 1,5 package of cigarettes (if you are a smoker here in germany)Ralph
It will be an important 1/3 when putting it on a non 1.3 series 1 with a 1.4 converter as you will lose the AF
Check this out... http://www.computeruniverse.net/products/e90391547/canon-eos-60d-body-schwarz.aspPay attention to this:"not availableProduct is no longer available. Only listed for information purposes."Can this mean that Canon will release the EOS 70D sooner than later? Maybe during the CES?This online shop is a reference in Europe.