April 19, 2014, 09:42:17 AM

Author Topic: Candid portraits  (Read 41983 times)

gary samples

  • Guest
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #105 on: July 08, 2012, 07:52:45 PM »
pixel peeping

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #105 on: July 08, 2012, 07:52:45 PM »

wickidwombat

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 4034
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #106 on: July 08, 2012, 09:00:41 PM »
window shopping
APS-H Fanboy

wellfedCanuck

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 239
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #107 on: July 08, 2012, 10:32:51 PM »
pixel peeping
love the look of concentration... ;)
Don't take my advice. Don't even take my advice not to take my advice.

Northstar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1190
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #108 on: July 08, 2012, 11:25:07 PM »
window shopping

This is a great candid portrait.
Look closer, it's not a robin.

1dX and 5d3... 24-70 2.8ii, 70-200 2.8ii, 1.4x and 2xiii, 85 1.8, 40 2.8, 300 2.8Lis

wickidwombat

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 4034
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #109 on: July 08, 2012, 11:52:47 PM »
APS-H Fanboy

Kamera Obscura

  • Guest
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #110 on: July 09, 2012, 07:24:26 PM »
sad.

dario./

briansquibb

  • Guest
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #111 on: July 10, 2012, 04:40:18 AM »
1DS3, 200 f/2

Yes her hair really is that soft and silky

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #111 on: July 10, 2012, 04:40:18 AM »

Northstar

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1190
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #112 on: July 10, 2012, 07:17:57 AM »
sad.

dario./

 I'm curious about this photo....could you expand on "sad"?
Look closer, it's not a robin.

1dX and 5d3... 24-70 2.8ii, 70-200 2.8ii, 1.4x and 2xiii, 85 1.8, 40 2.8, 300 2.8Lis

RichATL

  • Canon AE-1
  • ***
  • Posts: 65
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #113 on: July 10, 2012, 08:49:21 AM »
Getting into street photography with the shorty 40.


Peanut Connoisseur by RichMeade, on Flickr


Tucker Market by RichMeade, on Flickr


Watermelonman by RichMeade, on Flickr

cemsen

  • PowerShot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #114 on: July 10, 2012, 11:23:08 AM »
have been following CR for a very long time now. time to stop being a lazy arse and post something, for what it's worth.

Mark III / 135mm

westr70

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 170
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #115 on: July 10, 2012, 11:28:31 AM »
@samples. Is that kid on this forum?  I bet he is.  Great shot and well done.
5DIII; 600D; 7D; 100-400mm, f4.5-5.6; EFS-18-135, f3.5-5.6; 100mm, f2.8 IS; 70-200mm, F4 L IS; 17-40mm, f4 L USM; Sigma 50 mm, f2.8.
http://500px.com/Westr70
http://www.facebook.com/JohnFosterPhotography

Kamera Obscura

  • Guest
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #116 on: July 10, 2012, 11:44:58 AM »
That's the first thing that came to my mind after I took the picture.

May I kindly ask what prompted you curiosity? It could help my Photo eye ball.

Thanks,
dario.

bornshooter

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 674
  • Love L series glass
    • View Profile
    • my flickr
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #117 on: July 10, 2012, 11:57:27 AM »
one from george square in glasgow during queen visit

proud to be british by abledestroyer, on Flickr

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #117 on: July 10, 2012, 11:57:27 AM »

bornshooter

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 674
  • Love L series glass
    • View Profile
    • my flickr
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #118 on: July 10, 2012, 11:58:46 AM »
one from edinburgh a girl having a good phone call by the looks of it :)

It's good to talk by abledestroyer, on Flickr

tphillips63

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 55
    • View Profile
Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #119 on: July 10, 2012, 12:22:40 PM »
Here it is again - not sure why it is different


It's the same thing. I've read that Chrome always considers that photos are sRGB.

Here's a photo exported with ProPhoto (I'm curious if it works). Yuck, it doesn't! It's green as hell.

Okay, here's the same photo exported with aRGB. It doesn't work, but the colors are interesting. The orange is muted.

And below is exported with sRGB.

(Oh, they have EXIF: 40D, 70-200 F4 IS)


Chrome is not a color managed browser. IE9, Safari 5 and the latest versions of Firefox are. That is why your color in Chrome (and I see the same too) look crappy. Ditch Chrome.


I never noticed until I read this but comparing IE and Chrome side by side it is obvious.
http://mansurovs.com/is-your-browser-color-managed
« Last Edit: July 10, 2012, 12:32:08 PM by tphillips63 »
EOS 5D Mk III | EF 16-35/2.8L  | EF 24-105/4L IS | EF 70-200/2.8L II IS | TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II | EF 35mm f/1.4L | EF 40/f2.8 P | EF 50/1.2L | EF 180/3.5L | 600EX RT |

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Candid portraits
« Reply #119 on: July 10, 2012, 12:22:40 PM »