September 21, 2017, 06:47:53 AM

Poll

Should "karma" remain on the forum?

Yes!
38 (47.5%)
No!
32 (40%)
What's a karma?
10 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 79

Voting closed: January 15, 2012, 11:00:09 AM

Author Topic: Should karma remain on the forum?  (Read 29564 times)

waving_odd

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 152
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2012, 02:44:09 PM »
Maybe a way to "fix" karma would be to only allow you to vote +/- on a post when you reply to it. It is possible that this will generate more worthless replies (people post a reply just to vote and maybe then delete their post), but maybe it will also encourage more real discussion about positives and negatives rather than just hitting the +/- on the left.

Just an observation (I am not agreeing nor disagreeing) -- It's just more like FB, Google+, Yelp kind of thing where "Like", "+", or "Useful" are allowed at a thread's / post's level but not at a user level.  Having the functionality to "Dislike", "-", or "Useless" is in additional to what these sites have.

I think CR Forum is based on customization on Create a Forum's code base.  So I doubt if CR Admin can customize this granularity level on Karma without major code change.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2012, 02:44:09 PM »

waving_odd

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 152
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #31 on: January 13, 2012, 02:52:49 PM »
Every individual post can get voted up or down (but a user can only vote on a post once).

Again, voting at a post level should require some code change coz you said it's not an option of customization.

And your overall karma is an aggregate of all your posts that have been voted on, but weighted equally.  i.e. if you have 10 posts that are voted positive, and 10 that are negative you end up with neutral karma even if one of those posts got a disparate number of votes one way or the other.

But if you just want negative's to balance out positive's, it should be a relatively easy change.

thepancakeman

  • EOS 7D Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 476
  • If at first you don't succeed, don't try skydiving
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #32 on: January 13, 2012, 03:00:33 PM »
Just an observation (I am not agreeing nor disagreeing) -- It's just more like FB, Google+, Yelp kind of thing where "Like", "+", or "Useful" are allowed at a thread's / post's level but not at a user level.

Doing it by post is fine (or maybe even more gooder!), but again only having positive makes it pointless.

E.g.: "27 people like this!"  Well, 27out of 28 is impressive, 27 out of 10000 is not, but with such a system you have no idea how many people absolutely despise it despite the 27 kooks that like it.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2012, 03:02:25 PM by thepancakeman »

wellfedCanuck

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 248
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #33 on: January 13, 2012, 03:13:19 PM »
Maybe it'd be appropriate to ask the administrators about the level of customization that they can implement. If the code that supports the site is an off-the-shelf package there might not be options beyond karma/no karma.
Don't take my advice. Don't even take my advice not to take my advice.

CR Backup Admin

  • Administrator
  • EOS 5DS R
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #34 on: January 13, 2012, 03:57:13 PM »
Maybe it'd be appropriate to ask the administrators about the level of customization that they can implement. If the code that supports the site is an off-the-shelf package there might not be options beyond karma/no karma.

We have a choice of on, off, or combine scores.

Third parties write software to modify the basic forum software.  Only some of it has been tested with version 2.1 of the SMF software.  There are no guarantees that it will continue to work or that it will not interfere with other mods.  Simpler is  less likely to have a issue, there is a risk, so why take it?

http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?action=search;basic_search=Karma

smirkypants

  • Guest
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #35 on: January 13, 2012, 04:33:44 PM »
I just object to calling it karma. Prestige works better for me. I don't want to get a bad score and come back in the next life as a dung beetle.

cpsico

  • EOS 80D
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #36 on: January 13, 2012, 06:45:20 PM »
I vote no :), It seems to be abused in my humble opinion. Either post a civil opinion of disagreement, or make a better comment.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #36 on: January 13, 2012, 06:45:20 PM »

D_Rochat

  • Guest
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #37 on: January 13, 2012, 07:49:04 PM »
The confession:
I have given out bad Karma and I've given it to some of the most frequent and technically-knowledgeable participants on this forum. I give it to them when they belittle or mock other persons for disagreeing with their opinions (not their facts, but their opinions). They are particularly likely to receive negative Karma from me if they are mean to newcomers on the forum.  I do not give anyone bad Karma for reacting to or criticizing something I say (that seems petty to me), but if you pick on someone else, I will proudly give you bad Karma. A little passive-aggressive perhaps, but I find it much simpler and less frustrating than engaging in a prolonged debate on the forum over how their parents should have taught them some manners.

I think that's how it was intended to be used and not as a "disagreement button". I could be wrong, but that seems to make sense to me.

I haven't been disrespectful or belittled anyone since joining, yet my bad karma slowly rises. That tells me that people aren't agreeing with some of my posts and that's perfectly fine, but I don't think that's what it is for. If you disagree with someone, post a constructive argument.

Am I going to lose sleep over it? Nope. I've given a suggestion and I couldn't really care where it goes from there.

Smite away.

papa-razzi

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 159
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #38 on: January 13, 2012, 10:29:00 PM »
The problem with Karma is that it is so undefined.  Good and bad karma is given for disagreeing with an opinion, bad spelling or grammar, personal grudges, just for the fun of it, etc.  Karma can be given for any reason, and therefore it has no meaning.

I personally would only give bad karma if someone is being rude or disrespectful - but that is so rare on this site.

The other problem for me is if I get good or bad karma, I can't see a way to tell what post the karma was for.

So, to me Karma is completely meaningless.
6D | 7D  | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM | EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS USM |
EF 35mm f/2 | EF 50mm f/1.4 | EF 85mm f/1.8

Boyer U. Klum-Cey

  • EOS Rebel SL2
  • ***
  • Posts: 80
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #39 on: January 13, 2012, 11:46:35 PM »
Perhaps, Karma(n Ghia) points for those, who were Val-Dick at summer school a couple of years in a row, eh?
All theories are wrong, but some are useful, eh?

wellfedCanuck

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 248
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #40 on: January 15, 2012, 09:45:33 AM »
Maybe it'd be appropriate to ask the administrators about the level of customization that they can implement. If the code that supports the site is an off-the-shelf package there might not be options beyond karma/no karma.
??? This is all I've posted this week and I've collected 3 more minuses... It's the Heinz Doofenshmirtz avatar, isn't it? Three more smites and I'll have to think about switching over to a more positive image...


 
Don't take my advice. Don't even take my advice not to take my advice.

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 21489
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #41 on: January 15, 2012, 10:32:49 AM »
I'll have to think about switching over to a more positive image...

The annoyance factor of that large, purple dinosaur can't be overestimated.  I'd bet you;ll get more smites with that avatar... :P
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

smirkypants

  • Guest
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #42 on: January 15, 2012, 10:35:06 AM »
I know that whenever I say anything nice about a couple of the Sigma lenses that I have, I get smitten, and it has made me think twice about throwing it out there as an option. In journalism they call it "chill" when one isn't directly censored but is deterred from expressing an opinion.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #42 on: January 15, 2012, 10:35:06 AM »

D_Rochat

  • Guest
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #43 on: January 15, 2012, 12:46:59 PM »
I bet a Sigma 70-200 would be great on an APS-H 7D.

CowGummy

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 172
    • www.smrphotoart.com
Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #44 on: January 17, 2012, 02:58:07 PM »
I know that whenever I say anything nice about a couple of the Sigma lenses that I have, I get smitten, and it has made me think twice about throwing it out there as an option. In journalism they call it "chill" when one isn't directly censored but is deterred from expressing an opinion.

And that surely can't be a good thing! All members on the CR forum should feel free to speak their mind in my opinion.
5DmkIV   |  50 f/1.4  |  24-105L f/4  |  135L f/2  |  70-200L f/2.8 IS II  |  100L f2.8 IS Macro  |  430exII

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Should karma remain on the forum?
« Reply #44 on: January 17, 2012, 02:58:07 PM »