July 30, 2014, 02:35:00 AM

Author Topic: 1DX vs 1D IV ??  (Read 10604 times)

Crapking

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 342
  • "Whatever you are....be a good one." AL
    • View Profile
    • Crapking Photos
1DX vs 1D IV ??
« on: January 18, 2012, 08:21:47 PM »
Had the guilty pleasure of renting a ID IV this weekend to serve as a second body (to my 7D) to shoot indoor volleyball tournament.  While I am not a paid professional (yet), I am striving to take me vision to the next level, and despite nice lenses, the low-light challenges continue to plague some of my shots with unpleasant noise. While I think about light, in my world I cannot control it very much, so I am forced to think more about my gear ;) but only in so much as it helps me achieve on paper (and computer screen) what I 'see' in my mind, and what my clients (players/parents/coaches) can treasure forever.
While I was able to get more 'usable' shots with the 1D IV in the higher ISO ranges (4000-12,800), I'm curious to the potential of the 1DX in this setting vs the 1D IV.  I have not yet seen output from the 1DX, and wondering should I expect $2K 'better' high ISO performance.  I have almost weekly tournaments to shoot between now and June, and am debating whether to take the plunge now and get my own 1d IV or 'tough' it out with only a single body till the 1Dx comes out.  I also have the trip of a lifetime this August (Galapagos Islands) and will 'need' the second body there as well.  Are the 7D and 1D IV too close in function and therefore should I wait till the FF 1Dx is available?? While both pricey, the 'extra' $2K has me wondering how much more useful the 1Dx will be c/w the 1D IV ??
1Dx, 1DIV, 5D3, 7D, (Sigma 15 FE)
16-35/2.8; 24-70/2.8 II; 70-200/2.8 II, 100-400L
35/1.4, 40/2.8; 50/1.2, 85/1.2, 135/2; 200/2

canon rumors FORUM

1DX vs 1D IV ??
« on: January 18, 2012, 08:21:47 PM »

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4434
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2012, 08:55:16 PM »
i am hoping used 1D4 prices come down once the actual 1Dx start hitting the streets but i'm keen on getting it mostly for the 1.3 crop and higher res with better high iso over the 1D3 i have.
but i'm also keen to see if a new 7D2 might suit my needs too so i'm just in a holding pattern at the moment. if you can handle the extra cost of the 1Dx it will no doubt be an outstanding camera, but unless you have a pre-order you might be waiting quite a while...
APS-H Fanboy

pwp

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1457
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2012, 10:26:34 PM »
i am hoping used 1D4 prices come down once the actual 1Dx start hitting the streets but i'm keen on getting it mostly for the 1.3 crop and higher res with better high iso over the 1D3 i have.
but i'm also keen to see if a new 7D2 might suit my needs too so i'm just in a holding pattern at the moment. if you can handle the extra cost of the 1Dx it will no doubt be an outstanding camera, but unless you have a pre-order you might be waiting quite a while...

(I think) Dr Neuro explained fairly persuasively that the x1.3 crop on the 1D4 vs the FF 1DX is essentially meaningless. Cropping a 1DX file in post to a x1.3 value will deliver a file almost indistinguishable from the 1D4 file. Want to chime in here Dr Neuro?

When you factor in the improved AF, iso, big bright viewfinder etc it's probably going to be worth dropping that extra couple of $k on the 1Dx. As a very happy 1D4 shooter, I initially took some convincing on this, but now feel comfortably persuaded. The 1DX pre-order stays.

But yes, a low priced 1D4 would be a useful upgrade over the 1D3, especially if your work relies on high performance AF.

Paul Wright

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ********
  • Posts: 13601
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2012, 10:50:32 PM »
(I think) Dr Neuro explained fairly persuasively that the x1.3 crop on the 1D4 vs the FF 1DX is essentially meaningless. Cropping a 1DX file in post to a x1.3 value will deliver a file almost indistinguishable from the 1D4 file. Want to chime in here Dr Neuro?

Can't know for sure until RAW files are available, but in theory yes, you probably won't notice any significant IQ difference between a 1.3x cropped 1D X image and an uncropped 1D IV image. You'd have to be ok with the resulting 10.5 MP file size, of course. Going the other way, if you're not focal length-limited, the uncropped 1D X image will have better IQ (and slightly more MP) than the uncropped 1D IV image.  Note that I'm referring to RAW file IQ, ignoring the better jpg engine of Digic5+.
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4434
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2012, 12:08:18 AM »
(I think) Dr Neuro explained fairly persuasively that the x1.3 crop on the 1D4 vs the FF 1DX is essentially meaningless. Cropping a 1DX file in post to a x1.3 value will deliver a file almost indistinguishable from the 1D4 file. Want to chime in here Dr Neuro?



No chance of this i'm afraid
have a look at the iso samples indicating the crops here with the 18MP vs 16MP
http://www.thedigitalpicture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-Mark-IV-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx

edit: if you apply a 1.3 crop to the 1Dx resolution of 5184 x 3456 you get 3987x2658 which is 10.6 MP or basically the 1Dmk3
« Last Edit: January 19, 2012, 12:24:12 AM by wickidwombat »
APS-H Fanboy

briansquibb

  • Guest
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2012, 12:36:47 AM »
  Are the 7D and 1D IV too close in function and therefore should I wait till the FF 1Dx is available?? While both pricey, the 'extra' $2K has me wondering how much more useful the 1Dx will be c/w the 1D IV ??

If you are into sports the AF of the 1D4 alone puts it above the 7D by a long way. Almost every function works better than the 7D, particularly the IQ at high ISO. I went from the 7D to the 1D4 and was blown away by the improvements all round

Why not get a used 1D4?

revup67

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 626
  • Memories in the Making
    • View Profile
    • Revup67's Flickr Images
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2012, 01:11:53 AM »
I called Canon support on that 1Dx - the Digic 5+ processors alone may be worth ignoring the 1D IV.  The dual Digic 5+ processors (so I was told) are 6 times faster and create approximately 75 percent less noise than the DIGIC 4 processor.  The rep stated this results in a lesser need for larger MB's files hence why the MB is lower then most of its similar predecessors.  RAW images can be processed at 12 fps as well.  That's not to mention a boat load of other cool features such as dual storage cards that can be programmed in a variety of ways (such as a real time backup or extended disk space - you choose), bracketing with 9 exposures..the list goes on.  My gut instinct (being in IT) always says if you can afford it go forward with technology not backward.

Rev
PS I hope my wife doesn't read this thread.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2012, 01:20:36 AM by revup67 »
Thanks
Rev
Canon EOS 5D MK3 + EOS 7D » Canon50mm 1.4 » Canon 100mm IS USM L Macro » Canon 24-105 L USM IS » Canon 70-300 IS USM L» Canon MP-E65 » Canon 8-15mm Fisheye »Canon 16-35 Mkii USM L » Canon 200mm 2.8 L USM II » Canon 400mm 5.6 L » Canon 580EXII & MT 24EX Flash

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2012, 01:11:53 AM »

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4434
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2012, 01:35:08 AM »
I called Canon support on that 1Dx - the Digic 5+ (not Digic 5) processors alone may be worth ignoring the 1D IV.  The dual Digic 5+ processors (so I was told) are 6 times faster and create approximately 75 percent less noise than the DIGIC 4 processor.  The rep stated this results in a lesser need for larger MB's files hence why the MB is lower then most of its similar predecessors.  RAW images can be processed at 12 fps as well.  That's not to mention a boat load of other cool features such as dual storage cards that can be programmed in a variety of ways (such as a real time backup or extended disk space - you choose), bracketing with 9 exposures..the list goes on.  My gut instinct (being in IT) always says if you can afford it go forward with technology not backward.

Rev
I dont doubt it for a second that the 1Dx will overall be better than the 1D mk4
there are however 2 things that the 1Dmk4 has you can't get anywhere else
1) 1.3 crop I want this for using my 16-35 f2.8 as a walkaround effectively 20-48mm and for getting the extra reach on using long lenses. but has better IQ than the 1.6 crops
2) AF at f8 long lenses and teleconverters coupled with item 1 it stomps the 1Dx on the long end.

Ideally i would prefer not to have the bulk of a 1 body which is why i'm holding out for info on the next 7D and just continue with the 1D3 for now
APS-H Fanboy

willrobb

  • Guest
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2012, 01:57:49 AM »
If canon is willing to loan me a 1DmkIV and a 1DX for the next two years I'd be more than happy to test out all their similarities and differences and answer all the technical questions as best I can  ;)

revup67

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 626
  • Memories in the Making
    • View Profile
    • Revup67's Flickr Images
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2012, 02:39:01 AM »
Quote
1) 1.3 crop I want this for using my 16-35 f2.8 as a walkaround effectively 20-48mm and for getting the extra reach on using long lenses. but has better IQ than the 1.6 crops
2) AF at f8 long lenses and teleconverters coupled with item 1 it stomps the 1Dx on the long end.

Ok gotcha on the  (1) though I just read surprisingly on the-digital-picture.com that the current 7D has better resolution than the 1D IV (however) it is not as sharp with the settings on 1 but you sure get the tradeoff with that 1.6 extra reach so know what you  mean on item (2).  Used a 400mm today on the 7D bringing it to a 640 - that was a treat with wildlife photos.  Also used the 16-35 mkii like you with the 7D - most pleased.  If you are concerned with IQ, check out the DLA's on your camera choices as well (1DIII, 1D IV, 7D, etc).  Though diffraction doesn't have a huge impact it can affect IQ as well.  it's just one more thing compounded to reduce the IQ of your overall picture
Thanks
Rev
Canon EOS 5D MK3 + EOS 7D » Canon50mm 1.4 » Canon 100mm IS USM L Macro » Canon 24-105 L USM IS » Canon 70-300 IS USM L» Canon MP-E65 » Canon 8-15mm Fisheye »Canon 16-35 Mkii USM L » Canon 200mm 2.8 L USM II » Canon 400mm 5.6 L » Canon 580EXII & MT 24EX Flash

briansquibb

  • Guest
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2012, 03:12:10 AM »
You have only to look at the background blur and the shallower DOF is nice too from the 1D4

The leap from a 1.6 to a ff is huge leap in terms of thinking about what a lens does. Take a 70-200 for example - on a 1.6 this is a medium telephoto, on a ff it is a portrait lens. A 17-40 on a ff is an ultra wide, on a 1.6 it is a kit lens.

The jump from the 1.6 to a 1.3 is not such a big leap - the use of a 1.4 converter on the 1D4 brings back the reach without significant IQ loss whereas the 17-40 is now a useful wide ... and my TSE-24 becomes a useful 32mm and my 180 macro gives me almost 5DII IQ whilst taking me further away from the insects and getting the better AF.

PS 1D4 can do 7 bracketed shots

Viggo

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2007
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2012, 03:54:47 AM »
.

The jump from the 1.6 to a 1.3 is not such a big leap -

It is quite a big leap in terms of dof and IQ. And it's the same leap up to FF from 1,3 crop. After using the 1d4 for two years, and selling it, I know borrow my gf's 5d2, and the difference in smooth background and overall feel of the 5d makes my 1d4 look like the 7d when I had the mk4.

For me, the only SLR, is a fullframe now. It is such a huge difference in IQ from the crop-sensors. The difference in noise between 100-400 iso between mk4 and 5d2 is HUGE. The 5d has none, but the mk4 has too much. It doesn't get much more noise as you climb the iso-ladder, but dissapointing to see what you get at 100-400. Now, the 1d X needs to get here fast, I miss my AF...
1dx, 24-70 L II, 50 Art, 200 f2.0 L

briansquibb

  • Guest
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2012, 04:12:04 AM »
.

The jump from the 1.6 to a 1.3 is not such a big leap -

It is quite a big leap in terms of dof and IQ. And it's the same leap up to FF from 1,3 crop.

Now, the 1d X needs to get here fast, I miss my AF...

I was referring to the impact on lens use ...

I am amazed that you think there is a HUGE difference in ISO peformance - I can only assume you are pixel peeping because I cant see any noise from the 1D4 on my A3 prints. Glad to hear you like the smooth background of the 5DII - I got a lot of smites when suggesting the background of the 5DII was better that of a crop ... As Neuro says - the 1D4 is a compromise camera - it is nearly the best at everything.

The 1Ds3 has a much better AF than the 5D, is full frame and available now .... used prices have tumbled since the 1DX anouncement

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2012, 04:12:04 AM »

Viggo

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2007
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2012, 06:59:53 AM »


I was referring to the impact on lens use ...

I am amazed that you think there is a HUGE difference in ISO peformance - I can only assume you are pixel peeping because I cant see any noise from the 1D4 on my A3 prints. Glad to hear you like the smooth background of the 5DII - I got a lot of smites when suggesting the background of the 5DII was better that of a crop ... As Neuro says - the 1D4 is a compromise camera - it is nearly the best at everything.

The 1Ds3 has a much better AF than the 5D, is full frame and available now .... used prices have tumbled since the 1DX anouncement

Well, pixel-peeping, I do all editing at 100% crop, so if that's pixelpeeping, then yes. But it IS a huge difference. Especially when applying sharpening, you can see the noise pops out right away with the mk4, but the 5d you can really push it, and it just gets sharper. Shadow areas are much cleaner (This is all Lightroom-processed) Maybe that handles the file better from the 5d? But my guess is , as you said, it's a jack of all trades. I'm hoping for the 5d-IQ with all other things being a true 1-series speedfreak for the 1d X. I'm testing a BETA-X on 26 and 27th of january, I can try to post what I learn from actually use it here. I didn't get to use my own memorycard, so no pictures, but I will surley scrutinize and pixel-peep way beyond  ;D
« Last Edit: January 19, 2012, 07:09:18 AM by Viggo »
1dx, 24-70 L II, 50 Art, 200 f2.0 L

nikkito

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 371
  • Argentine freelance photographer
    • View Profile
    • Facebook photo page
Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2012, 07:33:46 AM »
You should get the 1D X. Full Frame rocks :)
www.nicolaszonvi.com - www.facebook.com/zonviphoto

1D X, 5D Mk III, 5D Mk II, 16-35L, 24-70L, 70-200L IS, 85 f1.2, 40 f2.8, 50 f1.4, Sigma 10-20 and many other toy cameras.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 1DX vs 1D IV ??
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2012, 07:33:46 AM »