At least some people in this thread have misread the second lens in this comparison, the prime "200 f/2.8L II", as the zoom 70-200 f/2.8L II.Glad you raised that I couldn't work out why someone would think the 200 f/2.8 was heavy. The 200f/2.8 isn't as fast as the 135 f/2 or the 400 f/2.8 but it is no slouch either
That wasn't the question, of course.
April 16, 2014, 09:05:29 PM
Topic: Focus speed comparison between 70-200 f4L and 200 f2.8L II (Read 2794 times)
That wasn't the question, of course.Might want to double check that
I'll be interested in a comparison (of the focusing speeds) with the 70-200 f/2.8L IS II as well.