November 21, 2017, 09:14:52 AM

Author Topic: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out  (Read 18926 times)

rrcphoto

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2025
Re: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out
« Reply #45 on: January 03, 2017, 11:37:49 PM »
you're right, camerasize doesn't have the RX100

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 13% (4.9 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 13% (31 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 [240 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Happier? the point still stood.

Against the RX100 II? the RX100 II only had 3.9fps, but had a non touchscreen tilt screen and a hotshoe.

yeah .. that's real innovation there .. right?

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out
« Reply #45 on: January 03, 2017, 11:37:49 PM »

pokerz

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 167
Re: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out
« Reply #46 on: January 04, 2017, 04:14:26 AM »
you're right, camerasize doesn't have the RX100

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 13% (4.9 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 13% (31 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 [240 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Happier? the point still stood.

Against the RX100 II? the RX100 II only had 3.9fps, but had a non touchscreen tilt screen and a hotshoe.

yeah .. that's real innovation there .. right?
RX100 123 does 10FPS, RX100 4  does 14FPS  and Rx 100 5 does 16FPS

I bet u never use  any Rx100 and start discussing lol

powershot2012

  • EOS M5
  • ****
  • Posts: 192
Re: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out
« Reply #47 on: January 04, 2017, 05:57:40 AM »
Thinking, for others.  ;)

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story.  ;D

Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :o  :D  ::)

reading is hard I see.   ::) ::)

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ************
  • Posts: 21767
Re: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out
« Reply #48 on: January 04, 2017, 07:33:44 AM »
Thinking, for others.  ;)

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story.  ;D

Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :o  :D  ::)

reading is hard I see.   ::) ::)

The RX100 is ~5 mm thicker and a few decagrams heavier.

It's ok if you don't understand physics, not everyone does.
EOS 1D X, EOS M2, lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

rrcphoto

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2025
Re: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out
« Reply #49 on: January 04, 2017, 10:14:05 AM »
Thinking, for others.  ;)

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story.  ;D

the funny thing is .. that once you get to 28mm the RX100's are at or over f2.0

the main comment was that you have compromises when you are attempting to make something smaller than optimal and maintain around a $500 price point at release.

hard concept I guess for some to gather.

« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 10:22:00 AM by rrcphoto »

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out
« Reply #49 on: January 04, 2017, 10:14:05 AM »