January 18, 2017, 11:49:00 AM

Author Topic: Is it Too Early for a 70-300II vs. 70-300L IQ Comparison?  (Read 559 times)

Cory

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 384
    • Cory Steiner Photography
Is it Too Early for a 70-300II vs. 70-300L IQ Comparison?
« on: January 13, 2017, 07:52:15 AM »
     Just wondering.
     Thanks.
70D, 10-18, 35 2.0 IS, 85 1.8 and 200 2.8II
430EXII, Induro AT113/Sirui K-20x
https://www.facebook.com/corysteinerphotography/

canon rumors FORUM

Is it Too Early for a 70-300II vs. 70-300L IQ Comparison?
« on: January 13, 2017, 07:52:15 AM »


slclick

  • 1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1589
Re: Is it Too Early for a 70-300II vs. 70-300L IQ Comparison?
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2017, 09:29:25 AM »
I think the L stands for Lack of purple in this case.
16-400L...it gets really expensive from here on.

Cory

  • Canon 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 384
    • Cory Steiner Photography
Re: Is it Too Early for a 70-300II vs. 70-300L IQ Comparison?
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2017, 09:37:21 AM »
I used that to compare a few things (thanks for the resource) which pointed to the 100-400II. 
Here's a video of my findings -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKCBWRU59zk
70D, 10-18, 35 2.0 IS, 85 1.8 and 200 2.8II
430EXII, Induro AT113/Sirui K-20x
https://www.facebook.com/corysteinerphotography/

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Is it Too Early for a 70-300II vs. 70-300L IQ Comparison?
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2017, 09:37:21 AM »