December 19, 2014, 04:41:58 AM

Author Topic: I've got a feeling: EF 24/2.8, 28/2.8, 28/1.8, 35/2, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 85/1.8...  (Read 11191 times)

ejenner

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 118
    • View Profile
I love IS.  I wish my 17-40 had IS, and would pay a lot extra for it.

But these?  Nah.  I would want either a relatively cheaper f4 IS  or a f1.4 and I'd go without IS assuming they had substantially better IQ than any of the zooms in this range.

I'm thinking they are primarily for video on a crop sensor.

Also no-one has really seemed to mention it, but 24 and 28mm seem really close together.  Is this just becasue they were designed similarly, so canon thought 'what the heck, we might as well make both'?

Or is is more 24 is a well liked FL on FF and 28 is closer to 50mm on crop?

No next we should get a 50mm IS lens for FF video.

canon rumors FORUM


TW

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 55
    • View Profile
**UPDATE: Well, I think my worry that Canon would move away from ES primes towards EF-S appears to have been unfounded. Thank goodness!
35+ years of Canon gear...good grief! Still have 2 FTb cameras in working order, too!

canon rumors FORUM