Smite me if you like, I'm getting a bit tired of all the bloody whining that is becoming increasingly hard to avoid on this forum.
Why is everyone getting so upset about two cameras that they haven't even used yet? Yes, I think that a high megapixel camera would of benefit to some users, but it seems that there are a large group of people here that have convinced themselves that the 5D MKIII is a poor camera based upon internet gossip and pseudo-scientific analysis. If 22MP makes the 5D MkIII a crap camera, then all the pros must be fools because both Canon and Nikon are trying to sell them cameras with "only" 16-18MP.
For years post after post on this and on other forums have blasted Canon about "mindlessly cramming more megapixels onto their latest sensor", but as soon as Nikon and Sony start doing it then it's fine! It seems that Canon were right all along: screw all other considerations, the average user can't see past the megapixel count.
Don't get me wrong, I'll criticise Canon on the price of the 5D MkIII, but I'm certainly not going to prejudge it based upon pixel count or files that I've found on the internet.