Image & Video Galleries > Macro
Canon 100mm IS USM L Macro Photos
keithfullermusic:
--- Quote from: LuCoOc on September 08, 2011, 04:36:50 PM ---
--- Quote from: keithfullermusic on September 08, 2011, 03:33:53 PM ---Why only "L"?
My non L seems to take some pretty daggone sweet pics!
--- End quote ---
There is another thread for the non L-version:
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php/topic,299.msg14542.html#msg14542
oh and there already is one for the L-version, too:
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php/topic,1195.0.html
--- End quote ---
Thanks, I didn't see those in the Macro section.
Razor2012:
--- Quote from: K-amps on September 08, 2011, 04:01:47 PM ---
--- Quote from: Jaredvs on February 09, 2011, 11:12:58 AM ---
Canon 100mm usm not(IS) sorry can't afford one!!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jaredvs/sets/72157622383982672/with/4731866369/
--- End quote ---
Wow! How did you get that level of magnification? very nice pic.
PS: I tried both the L and non-L versions. Both very sharp... but my non-L version seemed sharper.
--- End quote ---
Yes I'm curious too, how did you get that kind of magnification with the 100mm?
drjlo:
Extension tubes I'm guessing.
K-amps:
--- Quote from: drjlo on May 14, 2012, 01:09:02 AM ---Extension tubes I'm guessing.
--- End quote ---
Yes and maybe diopters.... or even MP-E65 perhaps ;)
bkorcel:
From What I can see here, the L version is sharper and colors look much better..though that could just be a factor of the shot presented.
I bought the L version due to sharpness, contrast, and color reproduction. I don't have time to deal with changing color profiles between lenses. Most of the L lenses have pretty consistent color across the board.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version