As I keep saying maybe Nikon have made some better cameras this round woopdy dooo so what
doesnt make the canons bad...
"ok guys thats it pack up and go home its official you cant take good pictures anymore! and infact any good pictures you have taken with a canon in the past are no officially longer good. DxO said so"
the differences are marginal IRL congrats to nikon for making some great cameras
but to think that navel gazing DxO results actually mean much? thats delusional
Bad photos can be taken with an IQ180 great photos can be taken with a D800e and award winning photos can be taken with a rebel. As the saying in drag racing goes "Run what you Brung"
I am seriously over all the crap and hysteria about 1 or 2 stops of DR that are generated from pushing shadow regions anyway.
why dont all the Noink DR fanboys take their D800s over to nikon rumours and have a nice circle jerk over them there instead of constantly plaguing a forum about canon
OK THE D800 IS THE BESTEST! WE GET IT ALREADY!
Its getting like that south park episode where every one bought hybrids
smug levels are getting outta control