July 28, 2014, 07:58:47 AM

Author Topic: Thoughts on Lowepro Inverse 100 AW  (Read 1375 times)

FunPhotons

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
    • View Profile
Thoughts on Lowepro Inverse 100 AW
« on: March 26, 2012, 11:39:28 AM »
I've tried backpacks, big and small, and they don't work for me. I like the Lowepro holster mini packs such as the Toploader 65, which is my go-to bag. The Toploader is just a tad too small, I'd really like to have room for a flash and an extra lens (which I could get with a side attached slip lock case), but I'm looking at the Inverse as maybe a good candidate.

Any thoughts on this bag?

canon rumors FORUM

Thoughts on Lowepro Inverse 100 AW
« on: March 26, 2012, 11:39:28 AM »

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ********
  • Posts: 13580
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Lowepro Inverse 100 AW
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2012, 11:24:17 AM »
My first camera bag was an Inverse 200 AW, it was a decent bag but bounced a bit when loaded. Unless your lenses are small (18-55, 50/1.8) I think the Inverse 100 might be too small (Lowepro overstates the capacity of their bags).

For carrying an extra lens (or two) and a flash, I now use the Lowepro S&F system - a Deluxe Technical Belt with Lens Cases and/or a Quick Flex Pouch. The Toploader Pro 65 AW also slips onto the belt. I find that affords a huge amount of flexibility.
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

FunPhotons

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Lowepro Inverse 100 AW
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2012, 04:57:31 PM »
Thanks NA, just what I was looking for. I thought the 100 might work well, but I want something snug.

I've looked at the belt system, but it felt, you know, a little geeky. Which is a joke since I'm an uber-geek. I'll give it another look.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Thoughts on Lowepro Inverse 100 AW
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2012, 04:57:31 PM »