I'm just wondering, alot of people get REALLY worked up over these dxo tests, however theire numbers relating to various cameras (to me anyway) dont appear to reflect real world results take the medium format digital backs for example, these are simply amazing yet score lower than a sony or a nikon?
Personally i dont put any faith in this sort of analysis
Note: lucky i cant get smited to death by the DxO brigade
I agree with you wicki. the more I look at real life sample picture from the various camera like D800, D4 and 5DmkIII at DP Review for example the less I find these DxO test relevant.
If any of you guy are audiophile and sound system lovers, you would know that a cheep sony amplifier often has much better spec sheet then a $10,000 amplifiers! But guess which one sounds better though in real life! (I need to remember this one next time I get paranoid about my camera spec!)