August 21, 2014, 10:17:17 PM

Author Topic: Canon FD 600mm f/4.5  (Read 7580 times)

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Canon FD 600mm f/4.5
« on: March 30, 2012, 05:01:35 AM »
heres a roo portrait I handheld this one!
« Last Edit: March 30, 2012, 05:17:18 AM by wickidwombat »
APS-H Fanboy

canon rumors FORUM

Canon FD 600mm f/4.5
« on: March 30, 2012, 05:01:35 AM »

Wild

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
  • Born to be...
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2012, 04:09:20 AM »
Hand held a 600mm lens without IS?  Ridiculous, and that's not even taking into account that it must have weighed a ton holding that thing. Must have some pretty big guns lol (not talking about lenses)  ;)

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2012, 07:36:47 PM »
Hand held a 600mm lens without IS?  Ridiculous, and that's not even taking into account that it must have weighed a ton holding that thing. Must have some pretty big guns lol (not talking about lenses)  ;)

its MF only too ;)

the technique I use was set the lens to minimum focus distance, held the lens and camera lookign through the viewfinder, advance slowly then when the image came into focus drop onto one knee kind of in a kneeling rifle shooting position and snapped of a short burst, (only 3 shots, 2 of which were sharp.

definately  not a lens that you can handhold often or for too long since the lens is 4.5kg and the 1D is 1.3kg its quite a beefy combo, much more comfy on a gimbal
APS-H Fanboy

Tcapp

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 510
    • View Profile
    • Timothy Capp Photography
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2012, 03:30:41 AM »
Hand held a 600mm lens without IS?  Ridiculous, and that's not even taking into account that it must have weighed a ton holding that thing. Must have some pretty big guns lol (not talking about lenses)  ;)

its MF only too ;)

the technique I use was set the lens to minimum focus distance, held the lens and camera lookign through the viewfinder, advance slowly then when the image came into focus drop onto one knee kind of in a kneeling rifle shooting position and snapped of a short burst, (only 3 shots, 2 of which were sharp.

definately  not a lens that you can handhold often or for too long since the lens is 4.5kg and the 1D is 1.3kg its quite a beefy combo, much more comfy on a gimbal

Awesome shot. How much does that lens go for? (Too tired to look it up.)
5DIII, 5DII, 7D, 50 1.4, 85 1.4, 70-200 2.8 IS L, 70-200 2.8 IS L II, 2x TC III, 15 Fisheye 2.8, 100 Macro 2.8, 24 1.4 L
http://www.TimothyCapp.com
Follow me on facebook! https://www.facebook.com/pages/Timothy-Capp-Photography/94664798952

untitled10

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 90
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2012, 05:07:07 PM »
Hand held a 600mm lens without IS?  Ridiculous, and that's not even taking into account that it must have weighed a ton holding that thing. Must have some pretty big guns lol (not talking about lenses)  ;)


its MF only too ;)

the technique I use was set the lens to minimum focus distance, held the lens and camera lookign through the viewfinder, advance slowly then when the image came into focus drop onto one knee kind of in a kneeling rifle shooting position and snapped of a short burst, (only 3 shots, 2 of which were sharp.

definately  not a lens that you can handhold often or for too long since the lens is 4.5kg and the 1D is 1.3kg its quite a beefy combo, much more comfy on a gimbal


Awesome shot. How much does that lens go for? (Too tired to look it up.)

Could only find one copy on ebay http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Used-Canon-FD-600mm-F4-5-S-S-C-Lens-/260881048561?pt=UK_Lenses_Filters_Lenses&hash=item3cbdb8e3f1

£1100 mark?

Tcapp

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 510
    • View Profile
    • Timothy Capp Photography
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2012, 05:29:22 PM »
Hand held a 600mm lens without IS?  Ridiculous, and that's not even taking into account that it must have weighed a ton holding that thing. Must have some pretty big guns lol (not talking about lenses)  ;)


its MF only too ;)

the technique I use was set the lens to minimum focus distance, held the lens and camera lookign through the viewfinder, advance slowly then when the image came into focus drop onto one knee kind of in a kneeling rifle shooting position and snapped of a short burst, (only 3 shots, 2 of which were sharp.

definately  not a lens that you can handhold often or for too long since the lens is 4.5kg and the 1D is 1.3kg its quite a beefy combo, much more comfy on a gimbal


Awesome shot. How much does that lens go for? (Too tired to look it up.)

Could only find one copy on ebay http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Used-Canon-FD-600mm-F4-5-S-S-C-Lens-/260881048561?pt=UK_Lenses_Filters_Lenses&hash=item3cbdb8e3f1

£1100 mark?


Not too bad for a lens that long. :)
5DIII, 5DII, 7D, 50 1.4, 85 1.4, 70-200 2.8 IS L, 70-200 2.8 IS L II, 2x TC III, 15 Fisheye 2.8, 100 Macro 2.8, 24 1.4 L
http://www.TimothyCapp.com
Follow me on facebook! https://www.facebook.com/pages/Timothy-Capp-Photography/94664798952

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2012, 10:18:00 PM »
Thanks! :)
I paid $1400 for mine got it off ebay from japan and its in perfect condition
considering its age not a spec of missing paint and crystal clear glass
APS-H Fanboy

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2012, 10:18:00 PM »

rpt

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2141
  • Could not wait for 7D2 so I got the 5D3
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2012, 07:33:57 AM »
Fantastic shot! Lovely technique too. How far was the roo?

Before you explained the technique I guessed you to be about 7'11" to do a hand held shot   ;)

marekjoz

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 945
    • View Profile
    • marekjoz @flickr
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #8 on: July 25, 2012, 08:35:49 AM »
No liveview? It was easier for me with such a lens (tried shorter bur with stacked extenders) but it required a LCD viewfinder/loupe. How many shots you tried before selecting this one?
flickr | youtube | 5D2, 50 F/1.4, 24-105 F/4 L IS, 300 F/4 L IS, x1.4 II

jhpeterson

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 142
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2012, 01:58:42 PM »
The bulk of my business involves photographing moving boats - usually from other moving boats.
Because of the conditions I work in, I need weather-sealed cameras. I generally use the 1DS and sometimes 1D bodies and most of the time need a long lens. The larger sensor makes the 300mm the most useful lens for me.
I've owned two copies of the 2.8 L over the past 20 years. They both have been outstanding performers. Many times, though, I'll need a little more reach, so I have to resort to glass in the 400 to 600 range. Frequently, I'll use a teleconverter, the later versions of the EX 1.4x  trade off very little other than a stop of speed, but once in a while a 400/2.8 or 600/4 is needed. By the end of a long day, I certainly feel I've gotten a good workout.

So, my hat is off to anyone who can successfully use these "big guns". The good news is, after working with one over a couple days, it kind of makes using a 300/2.8 child's play.
1D iii (x2), 1DS iii (x3), 6D, 16-35L ii, 24-105L, 70-200L IS ii, 24/3.5 TS-E, 40/2.8 STM, 50/2.5, 100/2.8L IS, 135/2L, 300/2.8L, 500/4L IS, 430EX II, EF 1.4x ii, EF 2x iii

Mt Spokane Photography

  • Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 8414
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #10 on: July 25, 2012, 02:21:38 PM »
Not having AF or IS makes the lens simpler, lighter, and much more reliable.
I tried handholding my EF 600mm f/4 (non IS), I could do it for less than a minute and only after removing the hood to shed weight out on the far end.  Since it is a fairly fast lens, cranking up shutter speed to 1/2000 in bright light was no issue. I think that lens was the heaviest regular production lens that Canon made.  A little heavier than its brother 400mm f/2.8 non is.
After that one occasion, I never tried again.

wickidwombat

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #11 on: July 25, 2012, 06:34:26 PM »
No liveview? It was easier for me with such a lens (tried shorter bur with stacked extenders) but it required a LCD viewfinder/loupe. How many shots you tried before selecting this one?
This was 1 of a burst of 3 from the 1d mk3 2 were sharp 1 was not the 1d viewfinders are great for manual focus
APS-H Fanboy

marekjoz

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 945
    • View Profile
    • marekjoz @flickr
Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2012, 06:42:10 PM »
No liveview? It was easier for me with such a lens (tried shorter bur with stacked extenders) but it required a LCD viewfinder/loupe. How many shots you tried before selecting this one?
This was 1 of a burst of 3 from the 1d mk3 2 were sharp 1 was not the 1d viewfinders are great for manual focus

Thanks, I never had 1d.
flickr | youtube | 5D2, 50 F/1.4, 24-105 F/4 L IS, 300 F/4 L IS, x1.4 II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 600mm FD f4.5
« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2012, 06:42:10 PM »