June 18, 2013, 08:14:19 PM

Author Topic: So..what sucks about this shot?  (Read 17351 times)

RLPhoto

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 2568
  • Gear doesn't matter, Just a Matter of Convenience.
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #45 on: April 10, 2012, 09:36:31 AM »
If you want the proof is in the pudding critique. Try out pixoto.com. It will put your image against other images in a duel and one will win and one will lose. You receive and average score to show you a real life critique of your photos.

It's sweet and I use it to judge my work against real world photographers.
My Canon Prime Trinity + 24-105L
24LII - 50L - 135L
www.RamonLperez.com

canon rumors FORUM

Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #45 on: April 10, 2012, 09:36:31 AM »

haqyourlegs

  • Guest
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #46 on: April 10, 2012, 09:42:04 AM »
Hi,

id like to get some critique whats crappy and whats maybe not so crappy about my photo.
Id also especially like to know if its over exposed or sth, since i dont got a good PC screen for digital image processing.
Im in week 4 now of doing photography ever in my life :3


Hey, sandymandy! First off, I love the concept of the shot. The fact that you are able to catch a moment in time that shows the love between two people is wonderful. Contrary to the earlier comment about the hand being "too manly", I have to disagree and say that the hand, for me, is one of the most beautiful aspects of the photo. I agree that having too much of the mother's face detracts from the impact of the image, but this is what photography is about: learning what works and what doesn't, and how you can improve. I would have tried maybe a bit of a different angle, focusing on the child's eyes a bit more, and if I used colour I would have created an image that was a little less saturated.

I do not think it is over-exposed, but when picturing people you have to be careful that their faces don't get lost in when you adjust the contrast. I am a big fan of high-contrast pictures, but usually when dealing with architecture or other still-life... when photographing people, try to have less harsh contrasts. Other than that, and agreeing with some others over here, it is a good shot for your first month. As you go along you will discover new ways of showcasing emotion and creating moving images. That is not to say that you should strive for perfection of emotion each time. Sometimes, it's just not there, and you have to work with what you have (especially if you plan on wedding photography and tensions are running high, achieving images that are lovey-dovey and perfect can be a hassle).

Anyway, I like it, but try not to get stuck in the "black-and-white-photos-are-art" mentality, because it's not true. Experiment with a lot of different things. One great website that has helped me a LOT with composition and other tips is: http://digital-photography-school.com/ ... it has weekly challenges that help you push yourself and see a lot of different types of work. I find that I am not 100% in line with some of the composition rules that the owner of the website uses, but it is a great place to get some inspiration and try a lot of different things.

Good luck, and keep clicking!

EYEONE

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #47 on: April 10, 2012, 09:51:18 AM »
...The photo looks a tad underexposed and the blackpoint is very heavy.  I'd like to see some rich dark shades rather than solid black.

The region of the child's lips is very dark.  It seems to get lost in the photo, and yet this is the part that makes the photo charming.  It's hard to see the child smiling.  I suggest trying some dodging here to brighten this area and to draw more attention to it.  The same holds true for the child's eye.
+1.  I was thinking most of this but did not communicate it well in my prior post.

I agree. It's a wonderful frozen moment but perhaps a tad underexposed. I'd pull back on the blacks, that alone might be enough but if not you could just brighten it up a tad.
Canon 5D Mark III w/BG-E11, Canon 7D w/BG-E7: EF 24-70mm f.2.8L, EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS II, EF 40mm f2.8 Pancake STM, Speedlite 430EXII + 430EXI, Canon EOS 3

Canihaspicture

  • PowerShot G1 X
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #48 on: April 10, 2012, 10:29:41 AM »
There's a lot of feedback from everyone so you probably don't need mine... I agree with the dodging and burning... My eye is drawn immediately to the bright white hat and stays there. It should have been a darker hat and if the little girl's hair were covered just a bit more you could have played the "little bald girl with cancer" angle.

When post processing pay attention to where your eyes jump to (1st, 2nd, 3rd etc) make it tell a story and don't forget to play on human emotions.

rhommel

  • Guest
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #49 on: April 10, 2012, 10:33:14 AM »
hello,

first of all, your photo does not suck. go here http://youarenotaphotographer.com/ and I know you'll feel better about your photo. :)

ask the woman in the photo what she thinks of it.  if she hates it, then ask her why, if she loves it, then you've done your job as a photographer

p.s i am sure that woman in the photo will like/love your photo, no doubt


bp

  • Rebel T4i
  • ****
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #50 on: April 10, 2012, 12:23:55 PM »
Who cares what anyone here thinks of it?  Do you like it?   Shoot for yourself first and foremost, develop your own style and to heck with anyone else's opinion

If you want to start trying to charge people to shoot portraits, you'll have to learn how to shoot to please the client, but beyond that, just shoot to please yourself.
5D3 - 5D2 - 7D - T2i   | 24L II | 35L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 24-105L | 70-200 IS II | Shorty Forty | 50 1.4 | Bower 14 | Rokkor 58mm f/1.2 | 2x III

preppyak

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 604
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #51 on: April 10, 2012, 01:48:22 PM »
I agree. It's a wonderful frozen moment but perhaps a tad underexposed. I'd pull back on the blacks, that alone might be enough but if not you could just brighten it up a tad.
Yep, had the same thought. If I could make out the babies eyes more, it'd have an even stronger emotional pull. And pulling back on the blacks would still leave the texture of the woman's hand without making it the focal point.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #51 on: April 10, 2012, 01:48:22 PM »

sandymandy

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 526
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #52 on: April 11, 2012, 02:34:07 AM »
go here http://youarenotaphotographer.com/ and I know you'll feel better about your photo. :)



This website is really funny! Thanks :)

Ill never do wedding photography i think. Im such a really slow photographer. U can call me slowpoke!
Oh and its not a "baby" in my photo :P She is 4 years old.
Heres the original resized. I think i should have used a more closed aperture.
« Last Edit: April 11, 2012, 02:36:08 AM by sandymandy »
1100D + 50mm 1.8 II + Flektogon 35mm 2.8 Zebra + m42 135mm 2.8 + m42 200mm 3.5 + Eos 300 analog + Seagull 6x6.
I really love shooting film but i dont develop it myself and im still using digital mostly for convenience. if i die im ready for it.

JerryBruck

  • Guest
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #53 on: April 11, 2012, 06:30:23 AM »
@sandymandy:  You've figured it out.  Everybody here except the newcomers, is enrolled in a stand-up comedy class and this website was created for us to try out new material on you guys.  It certainly took us long enough to get you smiling, but at least now we should pass the course. 

sandymandy

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 526
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #54 on: April 12, 2012, 07:37:30 AM »
Im confused. Is ur comment sarcastic about something i wrote? Or is it just meant to be funny. Im feeling a bit retarded because im not sure what u really mean. Or did u write that cuz i said "this website is funny" ? I mean the website in the link i got.
1100D + 50mm 1.8 II + Flektogon 35mm 2.8 Zebra + m42 135mm 2.8 + m42 200mm 3.5 + Eos 300 analog + Seagull 6x6.
I really love shooting film but i dont develop it myself and im still using digital mostly for convenience. if i die im ready for it.

entertainer

  • PowerShot G15
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #55 on: April 12, 2012, 07:56:03 AM »
my eyes are attracted to the hands more than anything else, but I think your emphasis should be on the kiss. :)

JerryBruck

  • Guest
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #56 on: April 12, 2012, 10:14:57 AM »
@sandymandy:  meant to be funny!  I was wondering how you (or anyone new) would react to the avalanche of advice and bickering that your straightforward query elicited.  This website IS funny,  (of course there may be some who don't see it yet),  not to worry. 

Maybe the time has come for you to take another picture...

JerryBruck

  • Guest
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #57 on: April 12, 2012, 10:18:13 AM »
Just noticed my mistake -- this must be the quoting-ist forum ever heard of!

sandymandy

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 526
    • View Profile
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #58 on: April 12, 2012, 12:53:02 PM »
Well, one of my weaknesses is that im having a really hard time abandoning something or someone even if its not important objectivly. So no matter what i will check back here many times per day. But i think i shouldnt try to read here when my brain is not fully awake :P
I will post more pics in about 2 weeks so let the gaaames begiiiin.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2012, 06:50:37 AM by sandymandy »
1100D + 50mm 1.8 II + Flektogon 35mm 2.8 Zebra + m42 135mm 2.8 + m42 200mm 3.5 + Eos 300 analog + Seagull 6x6.
I really love shooting film but i dont develop it myself and im still using digital mostly for convenience. if i die im ready for it.

JerryBruck

  • Guest
Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #59 on: April 12, 2012, 01:00:46 PM »
@sandymandy  That's the spirit.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« Reply #59 on: April 12, 2012, 01:00:46 PM »