privatebydesign, not my intent to shoot the messenger, but I feel sad that everyone forgets the poor, orphaned PowerShot Pro1. Who knows, maybe there'll be a PowerShot Pro2 someday...
So, at least, give us equivalent EF-S lenses to the EF "L"s....even if Canon doesn't give us the red ring.
To me, it does make sense to release weather-sealed lenses designed for the 7D and its successors, and if you take something like the 17-55mm with its L-level optical quality and add weather sealing to it, how could you
not call it an L lens? But maybe the compromise will be an EF 17-50mm f/4L IS? It would be the right focal length for a general purpose zoom on 1.6x, even if it's only f/4...
I would hope that anyone dropping >$2.5K on a camera body would know better than to try and mount an EF-S lens on it. After all, before there were EF L-series lenses, there were FD L-series lenses, and the latter certainly won't mount on EOS bodies.
I think the bottom line is that if Canon thinks there's a profit to be made by producing L-series lenses in the EF-S mount, they'll do it. Keeping the 'purity' of the L lens lineup, making sure an L lens will work on any EOS body, etc., will all be tossed out the window and into the Tamagawa River, if there's a profit to be made...