Gear Talk > Lenses

100L vs 70-200L II for portraits

(1/3) > >>

dunkers:
For those of you who have both lenses like I do, which do you prefer for portraits?

I love the 100L dearly, for it was my first L lens. I love its uses for macro/portraits and how ridiculously sharp it is. It was always mounted on my camera since the day I got it. I bought it mainly for macro and portraits. None of my other lenses came even close...


That is until I purchased the 70-200 II. I wasn't really shopping around for this lens, but I had to jump on the sale that Canon had last Christmas. Obviously this was my go-to lens shooting collegiate sports. The lens is as sharp as a prime and extremely versatile. My macro was suitable for indoor sports like volleyball and basketball, but the 70-200 is more useful and I got a lot more shots out of it.

However, I am torn between the two lenses for portraits. Obviously clients would be more impressed with the 70-200 II thanks to its size and color. The 100L looks much less imposing, but is tack sharp and produces creamy smooth bokeh. I love using the prime because it draws less attention and I love moving around to frame my shots. The 70-200 II is so sharp and versatile that my 100L is really only being used for macros =[

 Again, my question is which lens would you choose for portraits? Is there a benefit to using the 100L over the 70-200?

prestonpalmer:
The 100L IS is one of the sharpest lenses I own.  That being said, the 100L is used primarily for details, secondary for wedding portraits.  I lean toward the 70-200L II for the bride and groom session.  Simple because it speeds up the portrait process.  Less moving from me is faster, and time is always an issue.  I don't think your clients would ever notice the difference between the two lenses unless you handed them almost identical images side by side,  one at 100mm from the 70-200 and the other from the 100 macro.  Both lenses are fantastic, and both are in my bag at all times.  If my 2nd photographer has his 70-200 on, then ill use the 100macro.  I do love the lens for portraits, and would probably use it more if time were not such a concern.  this probably didn't help you at all!

Random Orbits:
70-200 most of the time.  The 100L is great for macro work but is also good enough that you won't have to switch lenses when you switch from macro work to portraiture.

D.Sim:
70-200 over the macro. Macro is great for small, up close details, but for general portraits I'd rather use the 70-200

Dylan777:

I have never own 100L before - so I can't speak for it. I use to have 70-200 f2.8 IS version I and last X-mas upgraded to version II due to Canon Rebate($300 off) Plus ($100 off from B&H).


My 2cents - the 70-200 f2.8 IS II is a TACK SHARP lens, even at 2.8.  I prefer this lens over many prime lenses. This lens is versatile on my 5D III.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page