"tarnished the reputation of a fine camera"I do believe this was in reference to second-hand value, potentially reduced over a big fuss about a problem that is not symptomatic within the specifications of the device and has been evident on other models unnoticed for years.
reputation of a CAMERA? what's with you people??
Absolutely right - the 5D3 will now be tarnished as 'faulty', when in fact it is within specifications just that in an obscure situation the metering is slightly out (than could easily corrected in pp)
I'll offer $2500 to anyone for their 'faulty' 5D3.
I didn't think so.
So much for the devaluation argument...
That is because they sent them back to Canon .....
The offer still stands when they get them back, since they will be forever devalued and all.
5D3, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100L, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, Canon TC 1.4x III