December 08, 2016, 05:47:36 PM

Author Topic: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79  (Read 83224 times)

DarkKnightNine

  • EOS M3
  • ****
  • Posts: 174
  • The best camera is the one that's with you.
    • Marven Payne Creative Visuals
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #345 on: April 24, 2012, 07:24:14 AM »
I'm loyal to neither brand, whatever gets the job done is the best camera at the moment. That being said I'm here on CanonRumors because I own a lot of Canon gear, but If at any point I felt like Nikon offered me severe advantages over Canon, I would sell everything I own and switch over. The fact of the matter is these two companies will always leapfrog each other. Wannabe photogs sit around worrying about test scores, while real photogs are out creating beautiful images with whatever they can get their hands on. One of my mentors still shoots with a Canon 30D and Sigma lenses. He has shot some of the most iconic pictures in the world e.g. Miles Davis actually smiling, Stevie Wonder with his glasses off, James Brown just before he died and on and on.
My point being, the 5D Mark III is an excellent camera regardless of those silly tests and probably more than most wannabe photogs need, but they seem to want more and more from the camera to compensate for lack of visual imagination. Personally I was out shooting with my 5D Mark III while most people were still sitting around in forums reading about it. I had to because I make my living from shooting. If I don't shoot, I don't eat. I have found nothing that made me think "darn it I wish I had switched to Nikon".
Bottom line, test be damned, my 5D Mark III does exactly what it supposed to do and when the 1DX is released I'll get two of those too. I'll let other people worry about test scores, my rent is due.
Canon 1DX, Canon 5D Mark III, EF 85mm F1.2L II USM, EF 100mm F2.8L IS USM Macro, EF 16-35mm F2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM, EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM, 600EX-RT Speedlites, Profoto Studio Strobes, and a whole lot of boat load of light modifiers.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #345 on: April 24, 2012, 07:24:14 AM »

KeithR

  • Guest
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #346 on: April 24, 2012, 07:59:58 AM »
What DarkKnightNine said...

BillyBean

  • Guest
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #347 on: April 24, 2012, 09:13:17 AM »
ok, so some people think "good enough" will be good enough... I think it won't ...

Wow - I sense your deep pain.

Must be really tough to live in your world of constant disappointment.

  • No possibility of marriage (always a better girl/boy around the next corner);
  • No house purchase, so live on a park bench hoping for the ideal house to become affordable;
  • No car, because there is always a better one...

Life is really hard that way.

My life, it's about compromise. I get the best I can, I enjoy it. It's working out pretty well so far.

Go get an EOS3 - you can have great autofocus and metering, upgradable high megapixel sensors (film) and all for $150... Seriously - I love mine.

NormanBates

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 487
  • www.similaar.com
    • www.similaar.com
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #348 on: April 24, 2012, 11:52:41 AM »
why would you write about my personal life? I know you were trying to be funny - I didn't find it funny

anyway, 6 months from now we'll know if "good enough" was good enough for most people or just for some



edit (let me try and fail to be funny now): you don't mess up with someone that calls himself NormanBates...
« Last Edit: April 24, 2012, 12:18:55 PM by NormanBates »

Fishnose

  • Rebel T6i
  • ****
  • Posts: 104
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #349 on: April 24, 2012, 12:27:54 PM »
Wow - I sense your deep pain.

Must be really tough to live in your world of constant disappointment.

  • No possibility of marriage (always a better girl/boy around the next corner);
  • No house purchase, so live on a park bench hoping for the ideal house to become affordable;
  • No car, because there is always a better one...

Life is really hard that way.

My life, it's about compromise. I get the best I can, I enjoy it. It's working out pretty well so far.

Go get an EOS3 - you can have great autofocus and metering, upgradable high megapixel sensors (film) and all for $150... Seriously - I love mine.

Damn, you're such a jerk.

briansquibb

  • Guest
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #350 on: April 24, 2012, 12:45:44 PM »
Wow - I sense your deep pain.

Must be really tough to live in your world of constant disappointment.

  • No possibility of marriage (always a better girl/boy around the next corner);
  • No house purchase, so live on a park bench hoping for the ideal house to become affordable;
  • No car, because there is always a better one...

Life is really hard that way.

My life, it's about compromise. I get the best I can, I enjoy it. It's working out pretty well so far.

Go get an EOS3 - you can have great autofocus and metering, upgradable high megapixel sensors (film) and all for $150... Seriously - I love mine.

Damn, you're such a jerk.

Name calling is not an appropriate response

NormanBates

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 487
  • www.similaar.com
    • www.similaar.com
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #351 on: April 24, 2012, 02:50:20 PM »
I'm happy with
6 months from now we'll know if "good enough" was good enough for most people or just for some
please forget about his comment and leave it there

canon rumors FORUM

Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #351 on: April 24, 2012, 02:50:20 PM »

K-amps

  • 1D X Mark II
  • *******
  • Posts: 1783
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #352 on: April 24, 2012, 05:02:41 PM »
I think Norman is referring to the apparent value proposition of the 2 cams. Canon seems to be an inferior Value, looking at it's higher price. The same feature set at $2700 would have been a lot more palatable... and then they could have released the 40mp 3D at $3800 and people would have gone for it, this would have outflanked the D800 on both ends.

Right now, they are just skimming the pond, Milking it for what they can. This is not 2005, when you have a great value in a FF body when all other FF's are selling at more than 2x the price nor is it an update that adds video and opens up a whole new world. This is fixing firmware, adding the 1dx AF and slapping another $1000 to the price of the predecessor... all this while the competition has moved ahead.

I own the 5diii and think it is a great Cam, just not a great value when you look at the competition. I wonder if Nikkor or Sony lenses dip in price... what effect that would have on Canon Body sales. The shadow noise I saw in Fed Miranda's test shots of the 5d3 vs D800 was a shocker for me... it was like a DSLR was pitted against a cheap PS. The color blotches were horrible. Good thing there's a lot more to shoot than shadows only.

There is inertia in Public opinion and Nikon suffered on that end in the mid 2000's, now it is gaining momentum, the tides are shifting and canon is sitting on their Backs researching $20k Cinema cams... Good for them, bad for us stills guys.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2012, 05:09:57 PM by K-amps »
EOS-80D & Pentax K1
EF Mount Rok 14mm F2.8; ∑ 24-105mm F4 A; 70-200 F/2.8L Mk.II; 100-400mm L Mk.II; EF 85mm L F/1.2 Mk. II; 100mm L F/2.8
Pentax D-FA 15-30 F2.8 & 28-105mm

Fishnose

  • Rebel T6i
  • ****
  • Posts: 104
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #353 on: April 24, 2012, 06:11:23 PM »
Canon seems to be an inferior Value, looking at it's higher price. The same feature set at $2700 would have been a lot more palatable... and then they could have released the 40mp 3D at $3800 and people would have gone for it, this would have outflanked the D800 on both ends.

Fair enough - value for money is a relevant issue.
But consider this: Canon has a massive customer base already. People who've invested in lots of glass etc etc. They know that photographers at this level (as opposed to entry-level DSLRs) simply go and buy the next generation of Canon when they feel they need to. They're not likely to swap allegiances because of a few hundred dollars.

Nikon OTOH has to aim for increasing their market share, being a little way behind. They fumbled the ball a couple of times early on in the DSLR race and have suffered ever since.

So - how do they convince newcomers to the higher end to buy Nikon?
By having something really AMAZING (36MP) and, amazingly, cheaper than the equivalent Canon! Now that is some smart marketing.
It costs them, as their margins will be a little leaner than Canon's, but they're going for touhdown, there's no other way to play this game.

So in fact the two big guns have made totally logical decisions in terms of both technology and pricing. Based on their present market situations.

And quite simply, these are both (5D3 and D800) absolutely amazing cameras.

Razor2012

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 618
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #354 on: April 24, 2012, 06:28:07 PM »
Canon seems to be an inferior Value, looking at it's higher price. The same feature set at $2700 would have been a lot more palatable... and then they could have released the 40mp 3D at $3800 and people would have gone for it, this would have outflanked the D800 on both ends.

Fair enough - value for money is a relevant issue.
But consider this: Canon has a massive customer base already. People who've invested in lots of glass etc etc. They know that photographers at this level (as opposed to entry-level DSLRs) simply go and buy the next generation of Canon when they feel they need to. They're not likely to swap allegiances because of a few hundred dollars.

Nikon OTOH has to aim for increasing their market share, being a little way behind. They fumbled the ball a couple of times early on in the DSLR race and have suffered ever since.

So - how do they convince newcomers to the higher end to buy Nikon?
By having something really AMAZING (36MP) and, amazingly, cheaper than the equivalent Canon! Now that is some smart marketing.
It costs them, as their margins will be a little leaner than Canon's, but they're going for touhdown, there's no other way to play this game.

So in fact the two big guns have made totally logical decisions in terms of both technology and pricing. Based on their present market situations.

And quite simply, these are both (5D3 and D800) absolutely amazing cameras.

Exactly, and it will just go back and forth.  IMO there are basically two camps, and they are fairly loyal followers.  So you probably won't see too many 'jump the boat' because of one camera, because the next release will be that much better again.  There certainly will be the ones that are on the fence deciding which way to go, but the majority have chosen.
5D MKIII w grip, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 24-70 2.8L II, 16-35 2.8L II, 100 2.8L IS macro, 600EX-RT

tron

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2877
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #355 on: April 24, 2012, 08:01:23 PM »
The shadow noise I saw in Fed Miranda's test shots of the 5d3 vs D800 was a shocker for me... it was like a DSLR was pitted against a cheap PS. The color blotches were horrible. Good thing there's a lot more to shoot than shadows only.

This is the only comparison that shocked me too  >:(

ippikiokami

  • Guest
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #356 on: April 24, 2012, 09:28:51 PM »
why would you write about my personal life? I know you were trying to be funny - I didn't find it funny

anyway, 6 months from now we'll know if "good enough" was good enough for most people or just for some



edit (let me try and fail to be funny now): you don't mess up with someone that calls himself NormanBates...

Are you kidding? it's been long enough in the field a lot of people are using them professionally already. Personally, I've shot 3 weddings, 2 big events for pure testing purposes before the weddings and shooting a photoshoot this weekend for a fashion client. Being able to shoot at the ISO's I shot were a God send in both what and how I could capture. I also sipped through batteries as some situations I just didn't need my flash where I did before and others I used much less flash.

Was I nervous on relying on high iso? Yeah.. but I tested it enough at music / film fest and coffee shop to know it's limits and stuck with it. Constantly during the wedding's I was just blown away at how high of ISO I could shoot. If I can get through all those situations I don't know that many people that would have more extreme ones that it wouldn't be "Good Enough"

Again as I've said in other post this is coming from a guy that was just an availability of the d800 away from switching over.

babarasghar

  • Guest
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #357 on: April 25, 2012, 01:00:08 AM »
the day earth stood still
the apocalypse
the day 5d3 was launched
I remember earth didn't stand still when 5d2 came out ... I dnt think so earth stood still when world Digital replaced Film
but I'm lucky to witness how a 500$ higher priced Canon has left its mark on history ... it seems I'm witnessing the great waterloo battle ... or Normandy landing or fall of Berlin n Berlin wall ...
even Hitler couldn't impress any spamer that much ...
I wonder why some one never asked on forum ... my eyes r closing should I sleep ... I'm having pain in stomach should I eat ... I'm smelling like a dog should I take bath ... I want to spend rest of my life with that girl ... am I in love ? cause most normal n emotionally balanced people know how to act in certain situations ... n if they ask then either they are not normal or they dnt have such needs ... so if still someone is splitting hairs between d800 n 5d3 he needs none of them ...
i wonder how people survived till 36mp d800 was not released ... how world functioned with 5d2 crappy AF system ...
:)
n I'm sure Maya predicted end of. world in 2012 cause NIKON will make a cheaper d800 n Canon  5d3 would cost 500$ more ... duh!!!

canon rumors FORUM

Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #357 on: April 25, 2012, 01:00:08 AM »

Fishnose

  • Rebel T6i
  • ****
  • Posts: 104
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #358 on: April 25, 2012, 04:19:30 AM »
babarasghar, I think you need to lower the dose of those apparently very strong tablets you're taking  8)

marekjoz

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 927
    • marekjoz @flickr
Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #359 on: April 25, 2012, 01:25:25 PM »
No more replies here? Come on, guys.
Did you know that DxOMark scores 5dmk3 total score 81 and 5d2 had 79?
lol
:)
flickr | youtube | 5D2, 50 F/1.4, 24-105 F/4 L IS, 300 F/4 L IS, x1.4 II

canon rumors FORUM

Re: DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79
« Reply #359 on: April 25, 2012, 01:25:25 PM »