Check this topic.
So why should we trust there sensor numbers http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1106506/
70-200 version II rates lower then 70-200 version I.
Think about this.
They know and we all know this is not true.
DXO guys also rate EVERY Nikon counterpart lens higher than Canon.
In real life the 70-200 II is one of the best zoom lenses in the world.
But DXO has nothing to do with real live.
What we see with our eyes doesn't matter anymore.
Number numbers numbers and numbers. This is a bad thing.
!!!!!! We all trust ONE company for all there numbers !!!!!!
The company that rates the 70-200 F4 IS and 70-200 F2.8 IS II not that good !!!!!!!!!!!!
While these lenses are tested superb everywhere.
FOR THOSE having the 300mm F2.8 version II, I feel sorry.
The 24-105 resolution wise is much better. Funny these clowns.
I own the latest NEX 7 and it should be close to the 5D according DXO numbers.
Well my eyes tell me it's not. Why ??
Take the camera , take pictures, see yourself and forget about this commercial company that sales software.