Gear Talk > EOS Bodies - For Stills
5D MK3 vs. D800 - fredmiranda
dilbert:
--- Quote from: DavidRiesenberg on April 28, 2012, 02:36:37 PM ---Dammit, so that means I cannot take good photos now?
--- End quote ---
No, it just means that if you took the same photo as someone else with a D800 using ISO 100-400 that the D800 image would always be better.
DavidRiesenberg:
Yes, I always push my shadows 5 stops so that would really be noticeable.
azizjhn:
Hi guys it is just products no need to be loyal to any one of them because they always loyal to your money, beside this is the best thing in competition so every company will fight to provide the best product for us the consumers.
Second thing we should not care about sensor, processor, web site reviews, Etc...
It is not about technology it is about the final result you get from your camera is it good for you or not. Doesn't matter what is better at what, you can just take what you need or what is more valuable for you.
Sorry my English is not very good cause it's not my native language.
Canon-F1:
--- Quote from: DavidRiesenberg on April 28, 2012, 05:11:06 PM ---Yes, I always push my shadows 5 stops so that would really be noticeable.
--- End quote ---
sorry but you react like stupid fanboy.
the fact that you can push the shadows 4-5 stops does not mean you have to.
but it´s fantastic that you can do it.
only a fanboy or blind can be unimpressed by the sony sensor at low iso.
seeing the results from fredmiranda and LL i have to say the D800 has an incredible sensor.
http://www.fredmiranda.com/5DIII-D800/t/canon-mk3-2b.jpg
http://www.fredmiranda.com/5DIII-D800/t/nikon2b.jpg
with 36 MP... and that shadow noise.. just WOW.
something i would not have believed 3 month ago.
canon can have all video improvements in the world.. i care about image quality.
for landscape or studio i also don´t care much about AF performance.
in fact i would be 100% fine with the 5D MK2 and just a sensor like the D800.
it doesn´t need to be 36 MP for me. but with that perfromance.. i can only say ..why not?
cpsico:
--- Quote from: dilbert on April 28, 2012, 01:59:08 PM ---
--- Quote from: cpsico on April 28, 2012, 01:12:52 PM ---We have all seen how well the d800 handles shadow detail, and I am impressed. I just wonder is it done at the expense of high lights? Has anyone done any comparisons in that area? I do a lot of landscapes and was considering the new 5d, but at 500 less and the price of a great zoom for a d800 i have much to think about!!
--- End quote ---
You should ask that sort of question about the D800 over on the luminous-landscape.com forums.
--- End quote ---
With all the know it all's in this forum surely some one must know with out having to go to another forum
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version