Rumors > Lenses
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II - Your thoughts
Dylan777:
--- Quote from: JR on April 30, 2012, 10:32:09 AM ---If the lens is as good as the chart, i plan to buy it. Main reason is flexibility of having a zoom with near prime sharpness for when i need it - simply for convenience. I will not replace my primes, but sometime i feel i could really benefit from a zoom in the 24-70 range instead of switching lens all the time...
--- End quote ---
I hope this lens will be sharp as 70-200 f2.8 IS II, or "Better". I don't mind spending another $2300 as long the lens can deliver it. I bought 3 different copies of mrk1 in the past (2 new, 1 used). No luck >:( >:(
scottkinfw:
4-105Hey Neuro!
Would you favor this lens over the 2 for use on a 5D II or a 5DIII based on iq alone, and not aperture?
Thanks.
sek
--- Quote from: neuroanatomist on April 30, 2012, 12:19:19 PM ---I plan to buy one. I have the 24-105mm f/4L IS now, and it's a very convenient lens, but often I want an extra aperture stop for better OOF blur, and sometimes more light.
My current plan is to buy the 1D X (preordered day 1 from B&H), then sell the 5DII, then buy the 24-70 II. That will give me the 'holy trinity' of f/2.8 L zooms (all in the Mk II versions) to complement my holy trinity of L primes (35/85/135).
--- End quote ---
marekjoz:
If it would only be compatible with coatings preventing from CA.
akiskev:
From what I've read on the INTERNET, the 24-70 II is a masterpiece. If I had the money, I'd buy it. No second thoughts.
RLPhoto:
For 2000$, Ill probably wait on this one. Perhaps a Sale during christmas Season? 8)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version