Rumors > EOS Bodies
LR4.1 RC to blame. Check this out!
Jamesy:
--- Quote from: sparda79 on May 02, 2012, 12:54:59 PM ---ACR 6.7 (full release version) just become available
--- End quote ---
Thanks for posting this. What5 is the "Camera Raw 6.7 Plug-in Release Candidate"?
I have been using "DNG Converter 6.7" as a standalone App.
I run CS5 and LR3. Would the Camera Raw Plug-in work in LR3?
Jamesy:
Found my answer here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4348227
TrumpetPower!:
I don't have time to post the pictures right now, but I did a quick test, as much of an extreme real-world one as I could think of that I'd ever want to do. I took a high-noon picture looking into a garden shed entirely in shadow. I exposed for the exterior, and underexposed by a couple stops. In DPP, after moving the exposure and shadow sliders all the way to the right, the interior of the shed was clean as a whistle. Even in Camera Raw, after boosting the exposure and shadows more than I'd ever want to do, it didn't take too much noise reduction to tame the noise.
If I have too much free time later, I might post some of it. But, as far as i'm concerned, all this nonsense about insufficient dynamic range is a tempest in a teapot. Get the exposure right and you'll be fine. Heck, get the exposure off by a stop or two and you'll be okay. There's more than enough clean information in there for any reasonable kind of post-processing. Any situation where you'd want more, you should have either done your job as a photographer to get better light on your subject or you should have shot HDR.
Cheers,
b&
MattBicePhotography:
--- Quote from: TrumpetPower! on May 02, 2012, 03:50:34 PM ---I don't have time to post the pictures right now, but I did a quick test, as much of an extreme real-world one as I could think of that I'd ever want to do. I took a high-noon picture looking into a garden shed entirely in shadow. I exposed for the exterior, and underexposed by a couple stops. In DPP, after moving the exposure and shadow sliders all the way to the right, the interior of the shed was clean as a whistle. Even in Camera Raw, after boosting the exposure and shadows more than I'd ever want to do, it didn't take too much noise reduction to tame the noise.
If I have too much free time later, I might post some of it. But, as far as i'm concerned, all this nonsense about insufficient dynamic range is a tempest in a teapot. Get the exposure right and you'll be fine. Heck, get the exposure off by a stop or two and you'll be okay. There's more than enough clean information in there for any reasonable kind of post-processing. Any situation where you'd want more, you should have either done your job as a photographer to get better light on your subject or you should have shot HDR.
Cheers,
b&
--- End quote ---
Well Said.
Tracy Pinto:
--- Quote from: MattBicePhotography on May 01, 2012, 04:06:53 PM ---So I read in the EOS bodies for stills forum that DPP handles the RAW files far better than light room. So to test this, I took this photo outside of my apartment with a bright texas sun off of white rocks and a nice dark shadow in the covered hallway. I opened the photo with DPP and just saved it to Full tilt TIFF. I then opened the photo in CS5.5 and Duplicated the background layer. On this new layer I adjust the shadows and highlights to 100% on the shadow slider. I also brightened the "X" even further using the dodge tool set to shadows and 100 exposure.
Let me blow your mind a little.
AND......
obviously these could not have been taken by a 5D3............. ::) ::) ::)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbicephotography/ here is my photostream so you can go look at the pictures at full size. I think LR4.1 RC certainly works better with Nikon.
--- End quote ---
I maybe missing something but the spray painted writing on the wall in the background seems to continue perfectly on the post and downspout in the foreground. How did this happen? Was that supposed to be your copyright added later?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version