Rumors > EOS Bodies

LR4.1 RC to blame. Check this out!

<< < (12/14) > >>

Bosman:

--- Quote from: Ivar on May 02, 2012, 03:09:19 PM ---This is LR (tried to go more neutral in color temp):



initial version by the OP:



--- End quote ---

The altered white balance looks more true now as far as what you mean by going more neutral.....

VirtualRain:
So I'm confused... is LR causing issues with pulling shadows or not?

te4o:
AFAIK Aperture 3 does the same nonsense to the RAWs as everyone here is complaining about. Sharpness is better than the initial DPP but push-shadows is not very impressive.

I am curious what you guys will recommend by the end of this day!

Bosman:
Here is my version adobe camera raw, and the settings used. I did nothing to the white balance but to tell you the truth my color calibrated monitor looks much better. I assume this would look better in Safari because they have a true color accurate setting in the browser unlike many others. Yes there was banding noise in the shadows but it was slight and went away quickly when i changed up the noise reduction with Luminance. Now the suggested edge the nikon D800 has is not so much as it seems. I wouldn't have taken too many photos with this scenario it would be all sun or all shade in the shot. so lifting shadows isn't too critical for what i do but that said my second shooter shot a couple majorly underexposed and it was too dark to bring things back but then she shoots Sony...
The top image is with CS5 Camera Raw 6.7, it looks un-natural and extra saturated whereas the same settings in LR 4 were used in the bottom image.
Aperture really made the shadows wack! It got a black pixelated and looked weird but the color auto adjusted ot a more natural color which i liked. at 4.690 k for temp and -8 for tint, whereas the LR and ACR 6.7 both were showing 4800 temp +5 tint.
Sorry, i saved them 800px wide with 120dpi. If you absolutely need large files just PM me i'l run it again and save them full size.
LR4 did good CS5, i don't know what happened...maybe because it was a 2010 adobe file instead of 2012 idk...

Bosman:
Here is the Aperture 3.2.3 edited version.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version